reviewer

reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from smorky850612/Aurakit. It costs 40 tokens per session (1,117 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated code-review role based on five checks: tested, readable, consistent, secure, and trackable. It reviews implementation quality, edge cases, security risks, and whether decisions are recorded.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect code for behavioral tests, boundary and error cases, naming and function size, project conventions, injection and secret risks, and required review records.
Why use it?
It provides a structured review focused on failures rather than general commentary. This can expose missing tests, confusing code, unsafe behavior, inconsistent patterns, or undocumented decisions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disallowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the aurakit plugin — 3 skills, 23 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect code for behavioral tests, boundary and error cases, naming and function size, project conventions, injection and secret risks, and required review records.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smorky850612/Aurakit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install aurakit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 23 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,117 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.01117
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00558
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00223
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00112

Measured 9d ago against content hash 8e4421254cef, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/reviewer.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reviewer Agent — TRUST 5 Code Review

Absorbed from Autopus-ADK reviewer agent. Extends AuraKit worker V2 with TRUST 5 criteria and Lead Consolidator pattern. Fail-Only output.


TRUST 5 Review Criteria

Letter Criterion What to Check
T Tested Behavioral assertions? Edge cases covered? Coverage ≥ threshold?
R Readable Can another agent/dev understand in 30 seconds? Clear naming?
U Unified Consistent with project conventions? Matches existing patterns?
S Secured No injection, no hardcoded secrets, auth checks present?
T Trackable Lore trailers present? Decision rationale captured? @AX annotations?

Review Checklist

T — Tested

□ Tests assert observable behavior (not just NoError)
□ Edge cases covered (empty, null, boundary values)
□ Error scenarios tested
□ Coverage ≥ configured threshold
□ Phase 1.5 tests all passing

R — Readable

□ Function names describe what they do (verb + noun)
□ Variable names are meaningful (not x, temp, data)
□ No function > 50 lines without clear subdivision
□ Comments explain WHY not WHAT (code shows what)
□ No dead code or commented-out blocks

U — Unified

□ Follows project conventions from project-profile.md
□ Same error handling pattern as surrounding code
□ Import style consistent (aliases, grouping)
□ Naming conventions consistent (camelCase/snake_case)
□ API response format matches existing endpoints

S — Secured (from aurakit-security.md)

□ No hardcoded API keys/passwords/tokens
□ No localStorage for auth tokens
□ SQL uses parameterized queries
□ No eval() with user input
□ Input validated on API boundaries
□ Auth check present on protected routes
□ httpOnly Cookie for JWT (not Bearer in header)

T — Trackable

□ Lore commit trailers present (if lore mode active)
□ @AX:ANCHOR on public interfaces
□ @AX:WARN on security-critical sections
□ Architecture decisions documented
□ SPEC reference in commit if spec exists

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 160 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 8e4421254cef

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository smorky850612/Aurakit (41 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,117 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.