Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smorky850612/AurakitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/spec-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/spec-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/spec-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/spec-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smorky850612/aurakit/spec-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01148 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00574 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00230 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
spec-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec Writer Agent — Requirements Specialist
Absorbed from Autopus-ADK spec-writer agent. Creates structured SPEC documents in EARS format. Used by
/aura spec:newto create.autopus/specs/SPEC-{ID}/directory.
EARS Pattern Reference
UBIQUITOUS: The [system] shall [action].
EVENT-DRIVEN: WHEN [trigger], the [system] shall [action].
UNWANTED: IF [condition], the [system] shall [action].
OPTIONAL: WHERE [feature included], the [system] shall [action].
COMPLEX: WHILE [state], WHEN [trigger], the [system] shall [action].
Input Processing
From user's natural language request, extract:
- What the system should DO (functional requirements)
- What happens when things GO WRONG (error handling)
- Performance / scale expectations (non-functional)
- What is OUT OF SCOPE (explicit exclusions)
spec.md Template
# SPEC-{ID}: {Title}
## Status
- [x] Draft
## Summary
{2-3 sentence description}
## Scope
In:
- {Included behavior 1}
- {Included behavior 2}
Out:
- {Explicit exclusion 1}
- {Explicit exclusion 2}
## Requirements
### Functional
- FR-01: WHEN user submits valid credentials, the system shall authenticate and create session.
- FR-02: IF credentials are invalid, the system shall return 401 with message "Invalid credentials".
- FR-03: IF user is not authenticated, the system shall redirect to /login.
- FR-04: WHEN session expires, the system shall automatically refresh if refresh token is valid.
- FR-05: WHEN user clicks logout, the system shall invalidate session and clear cookie.
### Non-Functional
- NFR-01: The system shall respond to login requests within 500ms (p99).
- NFR-02: The system shall support 1000 concurrent sessions.
## Dependencies
- External: bcrypt, jsonwebtoken
- Internal: UserRepository, SessionRepository
## Open Questions
- [ ] Should we support SSO/OAuth in this SPEC or separate?
- [ ] Session duration: 24h? 7d? Configurable?
acceptance.md Template
# Acceptance Criteria: SPEC-{ID}
## AC-01: Successful Login
**Given** a registered user with valid email and password
**When** POST /api/auth/login with correct credentials
**Then** response is 200 OK
**And** session cookie is set with HttpOnly and SameSite=Strict flags
**And** response body contains user.id and user.email
## AC-02: Failed Login — Wrong Password
**Given** a registered user
**When** POST /api/auth/login with wrong password
**Then** response is 401 Unauthorized
**And** response body is { success: false, error: "Invalid credentials" }
**And** no session cookie is set
## AC-03: Failed Login — Unknown Email
**Given** no user with the provided email exists
**When** POST /api/auth/login
**Then** response is 401 (same as wrong password — no user enumeration)
## AC-04: Authenticated Route Protection
**Given** no session cookie present
**When** GET /api/protected-resource
**Then** response is 401 Unauthorized
## AC-05: Session Expiry
**Given** an active session
**When** session token expires
**Then** the system attempts silent refresh using refresh token
**And** if refresh token also expired, returns 401
## AC-06: Logout
**Given** an authenticated user
**When** POST /api/auth/logout
**Then** session cookie is cleared (Max-Age=0)
**And** session is invalidated server-side
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 165 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 4780a96d0cd8
spec-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository smorky850612/Aurakit (41 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,148 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-extract-learnings
Use after a phase or milestone completes to mine artifacts for decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises that should feed forward.
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
scout
Fast exploration agent. File reads, codebase search, index queries, directory listing, grep, dependency checks. Use when speed matters more than depth.
refactor
Use when code has grown complex, has duplication, violates patterns, or needs restructuring - from code smells to architecture-level refactoring.