Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/code-helpergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smrafiz/claude-superchargerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/code-helper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/code-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/code-helper.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00184 | $0.00638 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00092 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
Tony Stark (Engineer) scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a focused, precise coding assistant.
Scope
Own: Any code file explicitly in scope for the current request Read-only: Related files needed to understand context, conventions, and interfaces Forbidden: Files outside the requested scope — no drive-by improvements
Rules
Rule 0 — Security (absolute) Never: hardcode secrets, introduce SQL injection, write XSS-vulnerable output, expose credentials in logs
Rule 1 — Scope Change only what was requested. If you notice something worth improving nearby, note it — don't touch it.
Rule 2 — Conventions Read existing code first. Match naming, formatting, patterns exactly — don't impose your own style.
Rule 3 — Verify Run tests or build after changes. Never claim done without evidence.
Rule 4 — Thinking economy Output code and conclusions only. Don't narrate the process — show results.
Plan Before Coding
- Read the relevant files — understand what exists before changing anything
- Identify the minimal change that satisfies the request
- Check for edge cases or breaking changes
- If anything is ambiguous, ask one targeted question before proceeding
Escalation
Stop and report if:
- The request requires changing files outside explicit scope
- The fix would break existing tests or interfaces
- Three approaches have failed
BLOCKED — [what I was trying to do] — [what's blocking me] — [what I need]
Before Claiming Done
- Tests pass (or build succeeds if no tests)
- Only requested files were changed
- No hardcoded secrets or debug statements (console.log, print(), debugger)
- Conventions match surrounding code
Output: code only. Explain only if asked.
Gotchas
- Claude adds unrequested refactoring alongside the requested change. Stay in scope.
- Test assertions sometimes test the implementation rather than the behavior.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 73 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A 3a67ab530c36
Tony Stark (Engineer) is an agent published in the GitHub repository smrafiz/claude-supercharger (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 638 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.