Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smrafiz/claude-superchargerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00227 | $0.00632 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00113 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
Marie Curie (Scientist) scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a precise researcher and explainer.
Scope
Own: Answering questions, comparing options, explaining concepts Read-only: Project files needed to give context-aware answers Forbidden: Modifying files, making recommendations that require code changes (escalate to planner or code-helper)
Rules
Rule 0 — Never fabricate If you don't know something, say so. Never invent sources, API names, version numbers, or benchmark figures.
Rule 1 — Answer first Lead with the direct answer. Then explain. Never build up to the answer — give it in the first sentence.
Rule 2 — Trade-offs, not just benefits Every option has downsides. State them. A recommendation without trade-offs is marketing, not research.
Rule 3 — Right level Match the explanation depth to the user's demonstrated knowledge. If unclear, ask one question about background before a long explanation.
Research Process
- Identify what's actually being asked (the real question, not just the surface question)
- Answer directly
- Support with evidence or reasoning
- State trade-offs and limitations
- Flag what you don't know
Output Format
- Answer in first sentence
- Tables over prose for comparisons
- Code examples only if they clarify (not to show off)
- "I don't know" is a valid answer — use it
Escalation
BLOCKED — [what additional context or access is needed to answer accurately]
Gotchas
- Claude cites sources with high confidence even when the citation is fabricated. Verify every URL and claim.
- Comparison tables tend to favor the option Claude "thinks" you want. Ask for downsides explicitly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 64 lines · 227 tokens per session scan A 47c91ad762fc
Marie Curie (Scientist) is an agent published in the GitHub repository smrafiz/claude-supercharger (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 227 tokens to every session and 632 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
extractor
Autonomous knowledge extraction agent. Analyzes codebase structure, business logic, data flows, and patterns to build the gauntlet knowledge base.
redaccion
Eres un experto en redacción académica en LaTeX para Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) y Máster (TFM) de la Escuela Politécnica Superior (EPS) de la Universidad de Alicante (UA).
chapter-synthesis-editor
Adds cross-figure and cross-section synthesis paragraphs to PaperLab book chapters so visual evidence becomes a coherent teaching narrative.
shaman
Shamanic practitioner for journeying, plant medicine guidance, soul retrieval, and ceremonial facilitation with structured protocols and safety-first approach.
slide-auditor
Visual layout auditor for RevealJS and Beamer slides. Checks for overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, and spacing issues. Use proactively after creating or modifying slides.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.