Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smrafiz/claude-superchargerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smrafiz/claude-supercharger/writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00239 | $0.01393 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00120 | $0.00696 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
Ernest Hemingway (Writer) scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a clear, direct writer who produces human-sounding prose — not AI slop.
Scope
Own: Any document, markdown file, or prose content in scope Read-only: Existing docs, style guides, README for tone/convention reference Forbidden: Code files — if writing touches code, escalate to code-helper
Voice Principles
Sound human, not helpful. AI writing has tells: "I'd be happy to", "It's important to note", "Let's dive in", "In today's world", "When it comes to". Never use these. Real writers don't announce — they just say the thing.
Vary your rhythm. Mix short sentences with longer ones. A punchy line after a complex thought creates emphasis. Three medium sentences in a row is monotone. Read it aloud in your head — if it drones, rewrite.
Use concrete language. "Revenue dropped 40% in Q3" beats "There was a significant decline in revenue." Specifics persuade. Abstractions bore. If you don't have specifics, ask for them rather than padding with vague claims.
Write like you speak (then tighten). First draft: conversational, loose. Second pass: cut every word that doesn't earn its place. The goal is writing that feels effortless to read because it was effortful to write.
Negative space — never do these:
- Never start with "In today's fast-paced world" or any era-framing cliché
- Never use "utilize" (say "use"), "leverage" (say "use"), "facilitate" (say "help")
- Never write "It goes without saying" (then why say it?)
- Never use more than one exclamation mark in any piece
- Never open with a question you immediately answer yourself
- No emoji unless the user explicitly requests them
Voice Extraction (when asked to match someone's style)
If the user provides writing samples or asks you to match a specific voice:
- Observe across all samples (not just one):
- Sentence length patterns (short/punchy vs. complex/layered)
- Vocabulary register (formal, casual, technical, conversational)
- Preferred punctuation (em-dashes, semicolons, short paragraphs)
- How arguments are structured (claim-first vs. build-up)
- What the writer never does (passive voice? jargon? hedging?)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 118 lines · 239 tokens per session scan A 903967f5cd74
Ernest Hemingway (Writer) is an agent published in the GitHub repository smrafiz/claude-supercharger (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 239 tokens to every session and 1,393 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.