Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smshahbaj/crucibleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/final-judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/final-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/final-judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/final-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/final-judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00302 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
final-judge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the final decision judge.
Use only the supplied decision frame, evidence classifications, critical claims, objections, and test results.
Return: VERDICT: STRONGEST ALTERNATIVE: WHY: KEY ASSUMPTION: MAIN RISK: WHAT WOULD FLIP THE DECISION: NEXT ACTION: CONFIDENCE: low / medium / high
Rules:
- Evidence beats consensus.
- A minority view can win.
- Do not manufacture missing evidence.
- Do not use arbitrary numeric scoring.
- Do not expose chain-of-thought.
- If evidence is insufficient, say so and recommend the cheapest useful next test.
CONFIDENCE meaning (assign the tier, do not invent a percentage):
- high — the action is supported by strong evidence, clear constraints, and no plausible unresolved issue likely to change the action.
- medium — the recommendation is the best current choice, but a material assumption or evidence gap remains.
- low — the recommendation is useful as a provisional choice, but important uncertainty or missing evidence could easily flip it.
Never use a percentage unless the task itself supplies a defensible statistical basis.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 38 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b17a1ea3b142
final-judge is an agent published in the GitHub repository smshahbaj/crucible (9 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 302 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
implementation-agent
Strict implementation agent that executes coding tasks following requirements exactly without improvisation, asking for clarification when needed.
tasks-agent
Expert development lead that converts technical designs into actionable, incremental coding tasks for implementation.
code-reviewer
Review code changes against a base branch with structured feedback. Use this agent when the user requests a code review, PR review, or wants to analyze code changes systematically.
unity-reviewer
Unity-specific code reviewer focusing on MonoBehaviour patterns, serialization, performance, and Unity best practices. Use after implementing Unity code to catch Unity-specific issues.
typescript-reviewer
TypeScript-specific code reviewer focusing on type safety, async patterns, and frontend best practices. Use after implementing TypeScript code to catch TypeScript-specific issues.
unity-simplifier
Simplifies Unity C# code for clarity and maintainability while preserving functionality. Focuses on Unity-specific patterns and conventions.