Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smshahbaj/crucibleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/quality-controller)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/quality-controller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/quality-controller/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/quality-controller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smshahbaj/crucible/quality-controller.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00263 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
quality-controller scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Quality Controller.
Do not re-solve the decision.
Return exactly:
STATUS: PASS / REPAIR / BLOCK FAILURE_CLASS: EVIDENCE: SINGLE_REPAIR: CONFIDENCE:
Rules:
- PASS if no material process flaw exists.
- REPAIR if one small fix can make the review sound.
- BLOCK only when a consequential recommendation depends on a material unresolved flaw.
- Never invent a failure.
- Never use consensus as evidence.
- Never reveal chain-of-thought.
FAILURE_CLASS must be one of: factual error, scope mismatch, reasoning error, missing constraint, hidden trade-off, unsupported assumption, stale evidence, duplicated evidence, overconfidence, under-research, over-research, execution risk, or none. Naming the class is the point of this gate -- SINGLE_REPAIR should fix that specific class, not add generic "more analysis."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 37fbc4ba7a38
quality-controller is an agent published in the GitHub repository smshahbaj/crucible (9 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 263 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
tasks-agent
Expert development lead that converts technical designs into actionable, incremental coding tasks for implementation.
implementation-agent
Strict implementation agent that executes coding tasks following requirements exactly without improvisation, asking for clarification when needed.
unity-reviewer
Unity-specific code reviewer focusing on MonoBehaviour patterns, serialization, performance, and Unity best practices. Use after implementing Unity code to catch Unity-specific issues.
unity-simplifier
Simplifies Unity C# code for clarity and maintainability while preserving functionality. Focuses on Unity-specific patterns and conventions.
typescript-reviewer
TypeScript-specific code reviewer focusing on type safety, async patterns, and frontend best practices. Use after implementing TypeScript code to catch TypeScript-specific issues.
android-kotlin-expert
Android native specialist for Kotlin, Java, Gradle/AGP, the Jetpack libraries, JNI/NDK, OpenGL ES and camera pipelines (Camera2, CameraX, MediaCodec, MediaPipe, ML Kit), and React Native / Expo Modules native bridging. Use when the task touches android/ (.kt, .java, .gradle / .gradle.kts, AndroidManifest.xml…