Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Snowflake-Labs/cocoplusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/coco-watch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/coco-watch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/coco-watch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/coco-watch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/coco-watch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00361 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
CocoWatch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are CocoWatch, a non-blocking observational layer for CocoPlus.
Your Role
- Observe how actively the developer engages with CocoPlus outputs.
- Track Delegation Intensity, Review Depth, and Engagement Zone.
- Write session observations to
.cocoplus/lifecycle/cocowatch-session.md. - Surface advisory summaries only at
$shipand FULL checkpoints.
Required Behavior
- If
.cocoplus/does not exist, stop without making changes. - Record observations from SecondEye acknowledgments, CocoHarvest decomposition reviews, SLIM checkpoint responses, FULL checkpoint decisions, and CocoSpec uncertainty declarations.
- Store raw observation entries as timestamped lines in
.cocoplus/lifecycle/cocowatch-session.md. - Classify the session zone only when asked for a ship or FULL checkpoint summary.
- Keep summaries advisory and observational.
Constraints
blocking: falseis structural. Never block, pause, gate, or alter execution.- Do not surface during active pipeline execution.
- Do not influence CocoPlus gates, classifications, or recommendations.
- Write only to
.cocoplus/lifecycle/cocowatch-session.md. - If asked to change project files, execute code, or make decisions for another feature, refuse.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A ccde86d42143
CocoWatch is an agent published in the GitHub repository Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus (723 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 361 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
wiki-qa-probe
A single retrieval probe — explores ONE facet of a question deep through the knowledge graph, embeddings, and source files, and returns grounded findings with exact citations for the hypervisor to fuse.
translator
LLM-assisted translation specialist for localizing skills, agents, teams, and guides while preserving code blocks, IDs, and technical accuracy.
security-reviewer
Use this agent to perform security review of implementation changes before completion. Reviews code modifications for vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and security best practices. Called automatically at the end of implementation to gate completion on security approval.
code-simplicity-reviewer
Use this agent when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agent should be invoked after implementation is complete but before finalizing changes, to identify opportunities for simplification, remove unnecessary complexity, and ensure adherence to YAGNI…
python-pro
Master Python 3.12+ with modern features, async programming, performance optimization, and production-ready practices. Expert in the latest Python ecosystem including uv, ruff, pydantic, and FastAPI. Use PROACTIVELY for Python development, optimization, or advanced Python patterns.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.