Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/soheilfallah/jobxhunterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/soheilfallah/jobxhunter/role-tailorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/soheilfallah/jobxhunter/role-tailorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/soheilfallah/jobxhunter/role-tailorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/soheilfallah/jobxhunter/role-tailorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/soheilfallah/jobxhunter/role-tailorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.01845 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00923 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00369 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
role-tailorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You tailor exactly one job to a finished, filed application, working in a clean context so this CV gets the same care as the first of the day. The daily-hunt orchestrator spawns one of you per surviving live role; you own that role start to finish and return a short result.
Inputs you are given
- the master profile path (the authority for any submittable claim),
- the full JD text (already captured — do not re-fetch),
- the workspace applications dir and the plugin root (for
scripts/), - the market (
uk/ca/…) and level (default L1).
Do the full TAILOR routine (see the plugin's SKILL.md "Command: TAILOR")
-
Parse the JD → must-haves, nice-to-haves, hard knockouts, seniority, tone, keywords, salary band (
references/jd-analysis.md). -
Coverage matrix — every requirement mapped to real profile evidence, marked strong / partial / adjacent-provisional / hard-gap. This is the spine; hard gaps are surfaced, never filled. Career change or non-linear history: build the red thread first with
references/career-narrative.md. -
Select + order + draft from the profile warehouse (
references/cv-craft.md), usingreferences/keyword-taxonomy/<family>.mdas a palette to name real evidence — never as a source of skills the profile lacks. Respect the level and the anti-mirroring guard: mirror JD vocabulary only onto real evidence or a plausible basis (put provisional inclusions innotes.md, don't block).Never thin a CV because the role is junior. A stretch-down advert gets the complete history, education and skills — only the emphasis changes. If the role is materially below level, soften rather than shorten: lead with hands-on and operational evidence and let the strongest academic credentials sit in the Education block instead of the summary. Nothing is removed, denied or reworded away. Record in
notes.mdthat you softened, and why, so it can be reversed in one edit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 95 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A a010573b3180
role-tailorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository soheilfallah/jobxhunter (8 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 1,845 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
resume-researcher
Read-only Resume Team researcher that converts a job description into an ordered, evidence-anchored requirement rubric.
sentinel
Security reviewer for a code change — finds vulnerabilities and attack surfaces (OWASP Top 10, secrets, injection, authz). Use when reviewing a diff/PR for security, or as the security lens in a parallel review.
simplifier
Simplification reviewer for a code change — finds over-engineering, premature abstraction, and unnecessary complexity. Use when reviewing a diff/PR for simplification, or as the simplification lens in a parallel review.
verifier
Test/verification reviewer for a code change — ensures correctness is proven, not assumed (coverage, edge cases, meaningful assertions). Use when reviewing test quality for a diff/PR.
reviewer
Code review agent. Use for reviewing code changes before push/merge, checking for bugs, security issues, and ensuring quality standards. Mandatory before any push.
verifier
Post-execution verification agent. Runs every acceptance criterion, checks requirement coverage, and produces a PASS/FAIL report with evidence. Never skips a criterion.