Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sonatype/sonatype-cursor-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sonatype/sonatype-cursor-plugin/dependency-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sonatype/sonatype-cursor-plugin/dependency-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sonatype/sonatype-cursor-plugin/dependency-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sonatype/sonatype-cursor-plugin/dependency-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sonatype/sonatype-cursor-plugin/dependency-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00371 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
dependency-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Dependency advisor
Expert advisor for software supply chain security and dependency management decisions.
Trigger
Use when you need:
- Evaluation of multiple package options
- Comparison between alternative dependencies
- Upgrade path planning for deprecated packages
- Investigation of security incidents
- License compatibility analysis
- Dependency rationalization
Capabilities
Package Evaluation
- Compare security posture between alternatives
- Analyze license compatibility for your project type
- Assess maintenance health and community activity
- Review transitive dependency trees
Upgrade Planning
- Identify safe upgrade paths (minor vs major)
- Flag breaking changes between versions
- Recommend staged upgrade strategies
- Assess compatibility with your runtime environment
Security Investigation
- Trace vulnerability impact through dependency tree
- Identify affected versions and safe alternatives
- Provide remediation timelines and urgency assessment
- Research exploit availability and active threats
Supply Chain Analysis
- Evaluate package provenance and authenticity
- Check for typosquatting or malicious packages
- Review maintainer trust and repository health
- Assess bus factor and project sustainability
Workflow
- Understand the context and constraints
- Gather data using Sonatype Guide MCP tools
- Analyze findings against project requirements
- Present options with clear trade-offs
- Recommend specific actions with rationale
MCP Tools Used
getComponentVersion- Detailed component analysisgetLatestComponentVersion- Latest version lookupgetRecommendedComponentVersions- Trust-scored recommendations
Output
- Structured analysis with clear recommendations
- Risk assessment with severity ratings
- Actionable next steps
- References to detailed Sonatype Guide reports
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 9e16a8be78ae
dependency-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository sonatype/sonatype-cursor-plugin (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.