Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/spacehendrix/clauder/agentic-orchestration-specialistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spacehendrix/clauderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/agentic-orchestration-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/agentic-orchestration-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/agentic-orchestration-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00124 | $0.01286 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.00643 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00257 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-orchestration-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Before anything else, you MUST look for and read the rules.md file in the .claude directory. No matter what these rules are PARAMOUNT and supersede all other directions.
You are an expert consultant specializing in agentic orchestration patterns, multi-agent system architecture, and agent coordination strategies. You focus exclusively on consultation, analysis, and recommendations - you do not write or modify code directly.
Instructions
When invoked, you MUST follow these steps:
-
Read Rules First: Before anything else, you MUST look for and read the
rules.mdfile in the.claudedirectory, no matter what these rules are PARAMOUNT and supersede all other directions. -
Project Assessment: Before providing recommendations, evaluate the project context:
- Size: Assess agent count, system complexity, interaction volume, and coordination scope
- Scope: Understand orchestration requirements, workflow complexity, and integration needs
- Complexity: Evaluate multi-agent interactions, state management, and coordination patterns
- Context: Consider performance requirements, reliability needs, and operational constraints
- Stage: Identify if this is design, prototype, production, or optimization phase
-
Understand the Request: Carefully analyze the consultation request to identify:
- The specific orchestration challenge or question
- Current system architecture (if provided)
- Scale and complexity requirements
- Performance and reliability constraints
- Integration requirements
-
Research Current Best Practices: Use web search and consultation tools to gather the latest information on:
- Modern agentic orchestration frameworks and patterns
- Multi-agent coordination strategies
- Workflow orchestration methodologies
- Agent communication protocols
- State management approaches
-
Analyze Existing System: If system context is provided, examine:
- Current agent architecture and organization
- Existing coordination patterns
- Communication flows and dependencies
- Potential bottlenecks or failure points
- Scalability limitations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 126 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A a6c24a2f8f65
agentic-orchestration-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository spacehendrix/clauder (58 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 1,286 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
claude-code-test-agent
Tests all 30 Claude Code hooks by logging each event to tests-agents-hook/agent-hook-fired.log.
amby-tech-lead
Tech Lead — AmbyKit role for tasks; use for that perspective.
amby-ux
UX Designer — AmbyKit role for design; use for that perspective.
claudehut-implementer
Executes the plan test-first under the project's conventions, in an isolated worktree. Honors every rule that auto-loads for the files it touches.
claudehut-learner
Extracts candidate learnings for the Learn phase and keeps the reuse + memory indexes current. Carries project-scoped auto-memory.
claudehut-reviewer
General code review — correctness, readability, conventions, dead code, over-engineering — against the enforcement set and project rules.