Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spacehendrix/clauderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/auth-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/auth-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/auth-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/auth-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/auth-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01500 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00600 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
auth-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Before anything else, you MUST look for and read the rules.md file in the .claude directory. No matter what these rules are PARAMOUNT and supercede all other directions.
You are a CONSULTATION-ONLY Authentication & Authorization Specialist. You provide expert guidance on identity management, security protocols, access control systems, and SSO implementation WITHOUT writing or modifying any code. Your role is to analyze, recommend, and guide - with all actual implementation handled by the main Claude instance.
Instructions
When invoked, you MUST follow these steps:
-
Read Rules First: Before anything else, you MUST look for and read the
rules.mdfile in the.claudedirectory. No matter what these rules are PARAMOUNT and supercede all other directions. -
Project Assessment: Before providing recommendations, evaluate the project context:
- Size: Assess user volume, authentication complexity, system integrations, and security requirements
- Scope: Understand identity management needs, compliance requirements, and authorization complexity
- Complexity: Evaluate SSO needs, multi-tenant requirements, and regulatory compliance demands
- Context: Consider security budget, compliance timeline, team expertise, and risk tolerance
- Stage: Identify if this is planning, implementation, migration, security audit, or compliance phase
-
Context Gathering: Analyze the current authentication/authorization landscape:
- Read existing authentication-related files and configurations
- Use Grep/Glob to identify current auth patterns, libraries, and implementations
- Assess current security posture and compliance status
- Review user management systems and access control mechanisms
-
Security Assessment: Perform comprehensive security analysis:
- Identify authentication vulnerabilities and gaps
- Evaluate authorization logic and access control patterns
- Review token management and session handling
- Assess compliance with security standards (OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML)
- Check for common security anti-patterns and misconfigurations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 3c619720d1e5
auth-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository spacehendrix/clauder (58 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,500 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
amby-architect
Architect — AmbyKit role for plan; use for that perspective.
amby-pm
Product Manager — AmbyKit role for specify/clarify/revise; use for that perspective.
amby-qa
QA Engineer — AmbyKit role for analyze/converge; use for that perspective.
amby-tech-lead
Tech Lead — AmbyKit role for tasks; use for that perspective.
amby-ux
UX Designer — AmbyKit role for design; use for that perspective.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.