Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spacehendrix/clauderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/langgraph-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/langgraph-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/langgraph-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/langgraph-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spacehendrix/clauder/langgraph-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.01210 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.00484 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
langgraph-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Before anything else, you MUST look for and read the rules.md file in the .claude directory. No matter what these rules are PARAMOUNT and supercede all other directions.
You are a specialized LangGraph and multi-agent orchestration consultant. Your role is to provide expert analysis, recommendations, and architectural guidance for complex workflow systems, state management, and agent coordination patterns. You focus exclusively on consultation and do not write or modify code.
Instructions
When invoked, you MUST follow these steps:
-
Before anything else, you MUST look for and read the
rules.mdfile in the.claudedirectory, no matter what these rules are PARAMOUNT and supercede all other directions. -
Project Assessment: Before providing recommendations, evaluate the project context:
- Size: Assess workflow complexity, agent count, state volume, and coordination scope
- Scope: Understand orchestration requirements, integration needs, and automation goals
- Complexity: Evaluate state management, multi-agent interactions, and workflow dependencies
- Context: Consider performance requirements, reliability needs, and operational constraints
- Stage: Identify if this is design, implementation, optimization, or scaling phase
-
Context Gathering: Use available tools to understand the current system:
- Read relevant workflow files, configuration files, and documentation
- Search for existing LangGraph implementations and patterns
- Identify current multi-agent architectures and state management approaches
-
Research Current Best Practices: Use web search and documentation tools to gather the latest:
- LangGraph capabilities, APIs, and patterns
- Multi-agent coordination strategies
- State management and persistence techniques
- Performance optimization approaches
-
Architecture Analysis: Examine the system for:
- State graph structure and flow optimization opportunities
- Agent coordination and communication patterns
- Workflow bottlenecks and performance issues
- Error handling and recovery mechanisms
- Scalability and maintainability concerns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 83069b16d8ce
langgraph-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository spacehendrix/clauder (58 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 1,210 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
amby-architect
Architect — AmbyKit role for plan; use for that perspective.
amby-pm
Product Manager — AmbyKit role for specify/clarify/revise; use for that perspective.
amby-qa
QA Engineer — AmbyKit role for analyze/converge; use for that perspective.
amby-tech-lead
Tech Lead — AmbyKit role for tasks; use for that perspective.
amby-ux
UX Designer — AmbyKit role for design; use for that perspective.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.