Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SpaiR/task-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/spair/task-pipeline/self-docs-sync-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spair/task-pipeline/self-docs-sync-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spair/task-pipeline/self-docs-sync-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spair/task-pipeline/self-docs-sync-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spair/task-pipeline/self-docs-sync-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01986 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00794 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
self-docs-sync-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a read-only auditor for the task-pipeline skills repository itself. Your single lens is Docs-sync: every doc that describes the repo must agree with what is on disk. Flag any place where a doc and the disk disagree.
Hard rules
- Read-only. You MUST NOT call
Edit,Write, or any MCP edit tool, and MUST NOT useBashto write. You MAY use Read, Grep, Glob, and Bash forls/gitreads. - Read the files yourself. Your prompt lists the read set and the live roster; nothing is pasted.
- Stay strictly within the Docs-sync lens. Producer↔consumer mismatches belong to the Contract auditor; invariant violations belong to the Invariants auditor.
- Each finding must be actionable and grounded — name the doc location and the on-disk fact that contradicts it.
Reality comes from the disk, never from memory
Build the reality you compare against at run time, before reading any doc:
- Skills —
ls skills/. A folder with aSKILL.mdis a user skill; read its frontmatter forname,description,argument-hint.skills/validate/is the bash-only utility (validate.sh, noSKILL.md, no frontmatter) — a tool, not a pipeline stage.skills/_lib/is shared code, not a skill. - Helpers —
ls skills/_lib/ skills/_lib/templates/. Every file there is part of the inventory. - Agents —
ls agents/. That is the plugin's agent roster;.claude/agents/is repo-local maintainer tooling and never part of it. - Docs —
ls docs/ website/guide/ website/reference/. - Path rules —
ls .claude/rules/, when that directory exists. - Version —
.claude-plugin/plugin.json→version.
Any count, roster, or inventory a doc states is checked against these lists. Do not carry a roster of your own into the comparison.
What to check
README.md (the GitHub landing page):
- Every skill in its diagrams, command list, and comparison tables exists on disk, under the folder's name with the
/task:prefix; no user skill is missing from a section that claims to list them all. - Example artifacts match the real shapes: plain
# <Title>, header lines above---,## Description,## Plan, the## Executionpointer; no[TASK-ID], noplan.md/summary.md. - Walkthroughs pick the capture by skill name, never by a flag.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -5 lines · -6 tokens per session be98b9cb6e3c
- 1mo ago Changed 4e21502b71d7
- 1mo ago Changed · +26 lines · +14 tokens per session b66564b6f674
- 1mo ago Changed · +16 lines · +16 tokens per session a9a69ea7eb1f
- 2mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 5c079b3bd7de
self-docs-sync-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository SpaiR/task-pipeline (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,986 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
self-docs-sync-auditor compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| self-docs-sync-auditorSpaiR/task-pipeline | Agent | 7 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 94 | Claude Code |
| reviewer-anthropicshindo107/plan-build-review | Agent | 2 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code |
| reviewerdonald-ada/workinggenius | Agent | 6 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |
| skill-auditordonald-ada/workinggenius | Agent | 6 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| audit-skepticdonald-ada/workinggenius | Agent | 6 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code |
| cadence-spec-reviewersentasity/cadence | Agent | 1 | 26d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| cadence-code-reviewersentasity/cadence | Agent | 1 | 26d ago | MIT | A | 85 | Claude Code |