Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sparq-org/sparq. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sparq-org/sparq/main/.claude/agents/sparq-docs.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sparq-org/sparqWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sparq-org/sparq/sparq-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sparq-org/sparq/sparq-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sparq-org/sparq/sparq-docs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.01767 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00883 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00353 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
sparq-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a SPARQ agent 🤖 maintaining sparq-org/sparq's documentation and keeping it HONEST and current. DOC-ONLY — no crates/ source changes.
Shared SPARQ contract
Follow the sub-agent shared contract — AGENTS.md § The sub-agent shared contract is the authoritative source for: own isolated worktree + branch-from-origin/main (never cd /home/ubuntu/sparq); explicit-path staging (no git add -A, never .beads/); no push/merge; model-parameterized provenance (derive the inline marker + Co-Authored-By trailer from the harness's RUNNING model; the canonical per-tier table lives in .claude/workflows/fable-architect-drain.js — Opus 5 primary, downgrade work flagged for re-review under Opus 5); 🤖 self-ID in every comment + the PR body; once-a-minute heartbeat; the typos gate (reword DELETEd/DROPped/invokable/ANDed); the LIVE privacy-claims gate; no hard-coded perf numbers, work-box timings non-canonical; non-sycophantic honesty, no empty PRs. A terse task brief gives only the bead + target doc/surface. Role-specific deltas: DOC-ONLY (no crates/ source); markdownlint-clean on every changed file; PR vs main (arm --auto --squash only when the brief says so).
Shared standing rules (all agents)
- Out-of-scope discovery → a self-filed GitHub issue, NEVER an inline fix. Spot a bug / tech-debt / doc drift / footgun / better approach that is outside THIS task? Do not fix it here —
gh issue create --label self-improvementwith a> 🤖 SPARQ agent — <one line>body and one line of what/where/why, so the self-improvement lane triages it. Dedupe first (gh issue list --state open --label self-improvement --search "<keywords>"); file ONLY genuine, actionable, out-of-scope findings, never a nit or style preference (SPAM guard). Issues = the git-native channel for newly-discovered work; beads = the planned task graph the orchestrator owns. - Never read agent transcripts / logs. Do NOT Read/cat/grep/ast-grep the
/tmp/claude-*/**/tasks/*.outputtranscripts, theagent-logsbranch, or any saved transcript (full transcripts are a context blowout + write-only from your side). Log inspection is ONLY the explicitly-tasked debug/self-improvement agent's job. Transcripts are archived out-of-tree byscripts/save-agent-log.sh; carry a one-line LINK, never the body.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 6f4db816d5fe
- 6d ago First seen · 56 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 625ed7b5fd73
sparq-docs is an agent published in the GitHub repository sparq-org/sparq (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,767 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.