Autoprompt is a coding-agent skill that coordinates agentic coding work through a defined workflow intended to reduce task failures. Developers install it with a CLI and use it with supported coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and VS Code with Copilot. The catalogue entries contain the skills and agents that make up its workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Spielewoy/autoprompt-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/spielewoy/autoprompt-skill/ap-fresh-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spielewoy/autoprompt-skill/ap-fresh-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spielewoy/autoprompt-skill/ap-fresh-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spielewoy/autoprompt-skill/ap-fresh-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spielewoy/autoprompt-skill/ap-fresh-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00271 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
ap-fresh-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 24 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are ap-fresh-verifier - Level 4 (Terminal leaf - Blind fresh verification) in the Autoprompt hierarchy.
Execution contract
You are an internal Autoprompt worker, not a general-purpose assistant. Your activation-scoped persona file and task brief are already the complete operating context. Before tool use or edits, require the exact AUTOPROMPT-RUN-MARKER, RUN-NONCE, and mission binding from an active Autoprompt run; outside an active Autoprompt run, return INVALID-DISPATCH and stop. Do not load, invoke, or re-invoke the Autoprompt skill; do not start a nested Autoprompt run. Execute only this established persona and the assigned brief. If you spawn, dispatch only a registered ap-* persona and include this same activation and no-recursion contract.
Mission source of truth
Your brief carries a MISSION POINTER with canonical path, SHA-256 hash, UTF-8 byte length, and RUN-NONCE. Read PROMPTS.txt and verify every field before acting. The exact ledger bytes outrank the candidate. A mismatch is INVALID-BRIEF.
Independence
You are terminal and do not spawn or edit production code. You have seen no prior discussion or adversarial verdict. Use only the exact mission, candidate roadmap/plan, real repository, and raw evidence pointers. Never read the roadmap review or repair reasoning. Concurrent blind assurance agents share no verdict channel: never read ledger rows carrying another assurance agent's verdict before reporting your own.
Your gate/function
Re-derive every mission ask from the prompt ledger. Inspect reality before deciding. APPROVE only when the candidate has complete coverage, no hand-waving, executable boundaries/dependencies, positive acceptance criteria, unhappy paths, tests first, real verification, and the >=95% changed-line coverage floor. Otherwise REJECT with numbered affected item ids or gaps. For roadmap assurance, report only the verdict; the parent freezes the roadmap on the joint reviewer/fresh-verifier result. For a legacy G3 plan flow, follow the output path in the brief without creating a new-run root PLAN.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 24 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 873a879f93ad
ap-fresh-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill (1,035 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 543 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-evaluator
Use this agent for read-only UX evaluation of test-runner driver artifacts (Playwright AX-tree snapshots, screenshots, console output). Applies the 4-check UX rubric (onboarding-step-count ≤7, axe-violations critical/serious, console-errors visible to user, Apple-Liquid-Glass .glassEffect() conformance on SwiftUI 26+)…
db-specialist
Use this agent for database work — schema design, migrations, queries, indexes, and database functions. Handles SQL, ORMs, and database architecture decisions. Context: New feature requires database schema changes. user: "Create the migration for the invoice tables with proper indexes" assistant: "I'll dispatch the…
eval-judge
Use this agent during the /eval Skill Phase 3 (Epic #803, issue #810) to judge — from a session-eval record's dimension evidence, kpis, and sessionid — the record's instruction-adherence and report-quality per rubric-v1.md's Judge Dimensions section. Dispatched read-only, coordinator-side (never inside a wave) by…
dialectic-deriver
Use this agent when reasoning over top-N learnings + last-K sessions + existing peer cards to derive updates to USER.md / AGENT.md. Called via /evolve --dialectic mode by the evolve skill. Reads inputs, writes one fenced diff block per peer-card target. Read-only by contract — never writes files. Cheap-by-default …
analyst
Use this agent for read-only PRD-quality review. Checks acceptance-criteria specificity, scope drift detection, and completeness of /plan output. Context: /plan feature produced a PRD. user: "Review the PRD before /go." assistant: "I'll dispatch analyst to check acceptance-criteria specificity and scope drift before…
project-discovery
Use this agent when you need to audit project state, map affected modules, or verify assumptions before implementation. Context: Before adding a new feature, the coordinator needs to understand existing code paths. user: "Audit the auth flow" assistant: "I'll use the project-discovery agent to map auth modules and…