Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SrulyRosenblat/skill-cardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/srulyrosenblat/skill-cards/nextjs-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/srulyrosenblat/skill-cards/nextjs-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/srulyrosenblat/skill-cards/nextjs-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/srulyrosenblat/skill-cards/nextjs-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/srulyrosenblat/skill-cards/nextjs-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.04525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.02263 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00905 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00453 |
Grade A, and why
nextjs-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 624 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 01639c83a094
nextjs-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository SrulyRosenblat/skill-cards (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 4,525 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
react-reviewer
Expert React/JSX code reviewer specializing in hook correctness, render performance, server/client component boundaries, accessibility, and React-specific security. Use for any change touching .tsx/.jsx files or React component logic. MUST BE USED for React projects.
compiler-review
Reviews Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares changed Rust code against the corresponding TypeScript source. Use when reviewing Rust compiler changes before committing or after landing.
frontend-reviewer
Review TypeScript/React code changes against OpenMetadata frontend patterns and CI checkstyle rules — ESLint, Prettier, import organization, license headers, i18n sync, Playwright lint, and component architecture.
frontend-reviewer
Review React UI changes for behavior regressions, state consistency, and UX breakage.
react-reviewer
React 19.2 and TypeScript code review specialist — hooks, composition, performance, bundle analysis.
test-author
WRITE-access test creation specialist. Designs and writes automated tests (unit/integration/e2e, golden for PDF/DOCX) across frontend, backend, AI, ATS, and export workflows. Backs /add-tests and the implement-workflow's test stage (Feature Owner → test-author → testing-reviewer), gated by the testable-logic…