my-agent

my-agent is an agent for coding agents from stbenjam/skillsaw. It costs 6 tokens per session (37 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review agent that examines requested code changes and reports concise, evidence-based findings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a change, validate possible issues, and summarize the evidence.
Why use it?
It provides a focused check of whether reported problems are real and actionable.

Agent

Part of the agent-top-level-displayname plugin — 1 agent shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/stbenjam/skillsaw/my-agent
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stbenjam/skillsaw

Or install agent-top-level-displayname, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for my-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stbenjam/skillsaw/my-agent.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stbenjam/skillsaw/my-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stbenjam/skillsaw/my-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stbenjam/skillsaw/my-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 6 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 37 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00006 $0.00037
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00018
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00007
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00004

Measured 5d ago against content hash 03d3b3da7714, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

my-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

tests/fixtures/autofix/agent-top-level-displayname/agents/my-agent.md · 11 lines

What it actually says

Review Agent

Instructions

Review the requested change, validate each finding, and report concise evidence.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 11 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 03d3b3da7714

Subscribe to this mod's changes

my-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository stbenjam/skillsaw (59 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 37 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.