Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology-codex/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology-codex/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology-codex/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology-codex/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00739 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 90 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 30d4fca8aca2
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology-codex (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 739 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
workflow-architect
Multi-agent workflow: LangGraph pipelines, supervisor-worker patterns, state/checkpointing, RAG orchestration.
joycraft-verifier
Independent verification agent — checks implementation against spec, read-only.
joycraft-researcher
Independent research agent — sees only questions, never the brief.
pr-reviewer
AWK PR Reviewer. Executes complete PR review flow: prepare -> review implementation -> verify tests -> submit. Used when analyze-next returns reviewpr.
conflict-resolver
AWK Merge Conflict Resolver. Resolves git merge conflicts in a worktree. Used when dispatch-worker returns needsconflictresolution status.
architecture-reviewer
AWK Architecture Reviewer. Performs architecture-level review focusing on code organization, module boundaries, dependency direction, and design patterns. Used as optional second reviewer when review.multimodel is enabled.