Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodologyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/interview-completeness-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/interview-completeness-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/interview-completeness-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/interview-completeness-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/interview-completeness-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
interview-completeness-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 107 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7106c735ba27
interview-completeness-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,033 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
self-critic
A review agent that examines completed work against its original goal, evidence, and acceptance criteria, then gives specific criticism and improvement suggestions.
ap-juror
L4 terminal leaf - G7 SIGN-OFF. One independent sign-off panel seat that saw none of the intermediate work. Binary PASS/FAIL on opened evidence; default-FAIL. A FAIL naming a P0/P1 blocker is NOT arbitrable into PASS.
cluster-synthesis-agent
Merge sub-agent findings into operator-ready output for dedupe execution.
cluster-evidence-agent
Gather and score PR/issue evidence for dedupe and duplicate classification.
code-reviewer
Code review specialist for /ship skill validation.
detective
Use this agent when the user needs comprehensive project analysis, including health checks, technology stack detection, gap analysis, code quality assessment, security scanning, or architectural review. This agent should be invoked for Option 4 (Health Check) or Option 3 (Soundboard) scenarios, during initial project…