Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodologyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01734 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
task-creator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Types: command (curl, python -c, docker build), MCP tool, API call, local server, agent with test prompt. The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 167 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 16692a3d136d
task-creator is an agent published in the GitHub repository stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,734 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Owns an MCP Task Orchestrator work item's review phase — independently verifies the implementation against its plan and fills the review-phase notes its resolved schema requires.
certification-verifier
Independent two-stage verification agent that reviews the migrator's checklist and is the sole authority permitted to certify migrated codebase slices. Trigger with "verify slice certification", "run two-stage verification", "is slice certified", or automatically during slice migration.
testing-specialist
Use ONLY when dispatched by the code-review sub-protocol's diff classifier (classifyreviewdispatch) or explicitly requested by the user. DO NOT use proactively. Reviews the TEST QUALITY of a change: negative-path coverage, test isolation violations, flaky patterns, and changed behaviour that ships without a covering…
quality-agent
PROACTIVELY reviews code quality, validates accessibility, checks security, runs tests, and assesses compliance when users need code review, want quality assessment, ask for testing, or need validation. Use for any quality assurance needs.
senior-developer
Use this agent when the user needs programming tasks executed, including feature implementation, refactoring, bug fixing, code reviews, or any code-related work. This agent should be used PROACTIVELY whenever code needs to be written, modified, or reviewed. It strictly follows Test-Driven Development…
quality-guardian
Code quality, testing, and validation enforcement specialist.