Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodologyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/task-creator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01734 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00867 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
task-creator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Types: command (curl, python -c, docker build), MCP tool, API call, local server, agent with test prompt. The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 167 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 16692a3d136d
task-creator is an agent published in the GitHub repository stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), with no licence file. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,734 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
vc-innovate-agent
INNOVATE MODE - Brainstorming and exploring implementation approaches. Discusses possibilities without making decisions. Use after research is complete.
designer
Visual designer, UX/UI agent, and Open Design handoff producer.
triage-scan
You are a triage analyst. ./input.json names one repo and the exact source tree to read it against.
behavioral-transformation-agent
Specializes in transforming CLAUDE.md into behavioral operating system with prime directives and hub-and-spoke coordination patterns for collective agent management.
qa-sentinel
The QA Sentinel designs test strategy -- what kinds of tests, where, why, and how they compose into a quality system that actually catches bugs. It does not write tests (that is the Testing agent). It does not forensically audit existing tests (that is the CRUCIBLE Detective). It is the architect of quality -- the…
scope-strategist
Scope and phasing strategist that defines complete implementation scope, identifies natural phases, and determines execution order with parallelism opportunities for full-scale feature delivery.