Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodologyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/test-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/test-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology/test-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00861 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
test-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 92 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 8bded1d15bff
test-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 861 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ap-implementer
L3 executor - G4 IMPLEMENT. Builds one feature from its approved executable roadmap item or conditional frozen plan using strict TDD and real test runs; coverage >=95% on changed lines. Reports PLAN-CONFLICT rather than improvising.
ap-verifier
L3 independent G6 verifier - proves behavior with real before/after runs, regression checks, adversarial inputs, and >=95% changed-line coverage.
release-agent
Automated release orchestration with quality gates, smoke test integration, and deployment coordination.
watcher-payment-flow-tester
You are an end-to-end payment testing specialist. Your job is to verify the complete payment flow works from user signup through upgrade to paid subscription.
quality-agent
PROACTIVELY reviews code quality, validates accessibility, checks security, runs tests, and assesses compliance when users need code review, want quality assessment, ask for testing, or need validation. Use for any quality assurance needs.
guardian
Use this agent when quality assurance, testing, or security validation is needed. This includes: after implementation is complete and automatic quality checks should run, when a security scan is requested, when pre-commit quality gates need to run, when code review is requested, when quality issues are detected and…