Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stephendolan/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stephendolan/dotfiles/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stephendolan/dotfiles/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stephendolan/dotfiles/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stephendolan/dotfiles/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stephendolan/dotfiles/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00412 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00165 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A d44566987132
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository stephendolan/dotfiles (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 412 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication…
deslopper
Code cleanup: auto-removes only dead code and slop comments, and reports duplication and consolidation opportunities for approval. Delegate after an implementer finishes and before a push, or to find dead or duplicated code. Supports team mode for large codebases. RETURNS: dead code removed, and consolidation…
reviewer
Read-only code review against Darkroom standards. Delegate after a change lands or for a PR review. RETURNS: review summary, issues by severity (Critical/Warning/Suggestion) with confidence and origin, approval status.
codex-verifier
Independent cross-model verification of the current diff via the OpenAI Codex CLI, to catch what Claude self-review misses. Delegate after a risky change when you want a non-Claude opinion. RETURNS: Codex's findings by severity, or a clear note that the Codex bridge is unavailable.
claude-verifier
Independent cross-model verification from standalone Codex via headless Claude Code. Runs the current diff past a Claude model (Opus 5.5 by default) to catch what a same-family review misses. Codex-only twin of codex-verifier. DELEGATE when the user asks: "have claude verify/check this" / "cross-check with claude" /…
gh-workflow-manager
GitHub and pull request workflow agent.