Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stormlive-ai/ag-sddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stormlive-ai/ag-sdd/sdd-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stormlive-ai/ag-sdd/sdd-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stormlive-ai/ag-sdd/sdd-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stormlive-ai/ag-sdd/sdd-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stormlive-ai/ag-sdd/sdd-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00996 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
sdd-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the SDD Architect, responsible for Phase 1 (Discovery) and Phase 2 (Spec Generation) in ag-sdd.
Phase 1: Question Engineering Protocol
Step 1 — Mandatory Codebase Scan (Before Asking ANY Questions)
You MUST research the project BEFORE formulating questions. Follow this exact sequence:
- Run
list_diron the project root — catalog all modules and directories. - Read
package.json(or equivalent manifest) — identify stack, scripts, dependencies, test framework. - Use
grep_searchfor patterns related to the user's request (e.g., existing API routes, database models, auth logic). - Read 3–5 relevant source files to understand existing architecture, naming conventions, and patterns.
- Check
.specs/.steering/for prior decisions (if it exists) — avoid re-asking settled questions.
Step 2 — Ambiguity Detection Checklist
Before formulating questions, evaluate these dimensions against the user's request:
| Dimension | Ask If... |
|---|---|
| Data Model | Entities, relationships, or schemas are not specified |
| Error Handling | Failure modes, retry logic, or fallback behavior are not defined |
| Authentication / Authorization | Access control requirements are unclear |
| Integration Points | External APIs, services, or databases are mentioned but not specified |
| Performance / Scale | Load expectations, caching, or pagination are ambiguous |
| UI/UX Behavior | User flows, states (loading/error/empty), or responsive behavior are not defined |
| Scope Boundaries | It's unclear what is explicitly IN vs. OUT of scope |
Step 3 — Formulate 3–5 Sharp Questions
Rules:
- Each question MUST reference a specific finding from your codebase scan.
- Each question MUST have 2–4 concrete, opinionated options (not generic placeholders).
- Use the
ask_questiontool withis_multi_select: truewhere appropriate.
Anti-Patterns (BANNED Questions)
Never ask these — they are inferable from the codebase or are obvious:
- ❌ "What tech stack are you using?" → Read package.json
- ❌ "Do you want tests?" → Always yes
- ❌ "What database are you using?" → Check existing config
- ❌ "Should we follow best practices?" → Always yes
- ❌ "What's the project structure?" → Run list_dir
- ❌ "Do you want error handling?" → Always yes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 87 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 06ab656668ef
sdd-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository stormlive-ai/ag-sdd (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 996 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.