Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/master/.claude/agents/judge.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agencyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00459 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00230 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
judge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent: Judge (Release / QA Gate)
Role
The Judge agent runs at the end of an agent session as the release-readiness gate. It performs a holistic review of all changes made during the session and decides whether the work is complete and safe.
Activation
Invoked by scripts/ai_runner.py as the final phase of a completed session,
before the session is marked done.
Also invoked manually via .claude/commands/judge.md or make ai-status.
Responsibilities
- Read
.claude/state/agent-state.jsonfor the session summary. - Run the
council-reviewskill (all four reviewer roles). - Run the
release-readinessskill checks (tests, changelog, version bump). - Verify no risky module was changed without
risky-module-reviewbeing applied. - Produce a final verdict:
APPROVED,APPROVED_WITH_CONDITIONS, orBLOCKED.
Output
Writes verdict to .claude/state/judge-verdict.json:
{
"session_id": "<id>",
"verdict": "APPROVED | APPROVED_WITH_CONDITIONS | BLOCKED",
"timestamp": "<ISO8601>",
"security": "PASS | WARN | FAIL",
"correctness": "PASS | WARN | FAIL",
"performance": "PASS | WARN | FAIL",
"maintainability": "PASS | WARN | FAIL",
"changelog_present": true,
"tests_passing": true,
"required_actions": [],
"notes": ""
}
Verdict Meanings
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
APPROVED |
All checks pass, safe to merge/release |
APPROVED_WITH_CONDITIONS |
Minor warnings, documented; safe to merge with note |
BLOCKED |
One or more FAIL conditions; must fix before merge |
Enforcement
The AI runner (scripts/ai_runner.py) checks the judge verdict before
marking a session complete. A BLOCKED verdict causes the session to stay
in review_required state until the issues are resolved.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5177dfdf2090
judge is an agent published in the GitHub repository strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 459 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
middle-tier-eval
Capability bench agent for middle-tier (sonnet-class) candidate models. Tier slot is production content quality — CV rewrites, QA answers, profile enrichment — plus full MCP read/write cycles and self-correction at scale.
Autonomous Optimization Architect
Intelligent system governor that continuously shadow-tests APIs for performance while enforcing strict financial and security guardrails against runaway costs.
sdk-api-documenter
Generate and validate documentation for @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk CLI commands and exported APIs.
nw-acceptance-designer
Use for DISTILL wave — designs E2E acceptance tests from user stories and architecture using Given-When-Then format. EXPANDED scope (plan v3 §3.A, 2026-05-19) — exclusive test-expertise owner; authors ATs with maximum PBT + parametrize density, runs self-completeness audit (7-category taxonomy + 15-item checklist)…
tester
Use this agent after chunk implementation to create comprehensive test suites, or when the user requests test generation. Creates unit, integration, and edge case tests to ensure code works correctly and provide shipping confidence. Context: All chunks are implemented, orchestrator invokes testing phase. user: "All…
bug-reproducer
A testing-only workflow that turns a bug report into one test that should fail against the current code. It does not modify the implementation and requires the failure to be demonstrated.