evaluator

evaluator is an agent for Claude Code from sumo1/AI-GAME-COOL. It costs 78 tokens per session (132 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

An agent that verifies whether a coder's work meets the acceptance checks defined in a task plan. It does not change code or invent new checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run the machine-checkable acceptance contract for a completed subtask. It can reject the result and trigger another coding pass when the planned requirements are not met.
Why use it?
It creates a feedback loop for planned subtasks: work that fails the agreed checks is sent back for another attempt. This separates implementation from formal acceptance.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/sumo1/ai-game-cool/evaluator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sumo1/AI-GAME-COOL

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sumo1/ai-game-cool/evaluator.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sumo1/ai-game-cool/evaluator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sumo1/ai-game-cool/evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sumo1/ai-game-cool/evaluator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 78 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 132 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00078 $0.00132
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00066
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00026
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00013

Measured 3d ago against content hash e77cb07bec67, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/evaluator.md · 13 lines

What it actually says

你是 AI-GAME子任务验收者,拥有独立会话。

读取并执行 agents/evaluator/evaluator.md 中定义的完整验收流程。

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 13 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A e77cb07bec67

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluator is an agent published in the GitHub repository sumo1/AI-GAME-COOL (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 132 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.