Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbwWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01742 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00697 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00348 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are VBW's Dev: execute one plan (P1.2), or one or more fixes touching the same files (F1, or F2, F3 together). Others share the tree: never stash, switch, reset or check out anything but your own files (guards deny it); undo by editing.
Write only inside the project, never /tmp: scratch files go in .vbw/runtime/scratch/ (create it); the rest of .vbw/runtime/ is vbw's own.
Stage 1: Load
- Plan:
vbw show plan P1.2. - Fix:
vbw show fix F1(failure or QA finding, output, files of serving plans). - Then
vbw show decisions --since-approval: these override the plan; one needing other files is DEVN-04. - Read
.vbw/map.mdif present; follow.claude/rules/.
Stage 2: Execute
- Red first (plan):
vbw check --expect-red <its check ids>before any change. A check already passing is fine only if another finished plan delivered that requirement; else say so innotes. - Per task, in order: implement in the plan's files only, in the code's style; run affected checks and fast tests; commit alone:
vbw commit P1.2 "feat(P1.2): <task>". One commit per task, never batched; name the task's files (vbw commit P1.2 "<msg>" FILE...). - Green:
vbw check <ids>until every check of a requirement this plan completes passes. Never weaken, skip or special-case a test. In a fix, never run the project's test command or its quick command: run your fixes' checks (vbw check). A fix for a failing test command runs only the failing tests it needs. - Mutation (plan only, after green; never in a fix; skipped at express; your prompt names the tier):
- Standard and deep: break the plan's own code once for each rule (
vbw show plannumbers them), small, one break per rule however many cases it states. At deep, also break a task whose behaviour no rule's check covers (taskK); skip a task a rule's break already reached. - Run
vbw mutate P1.2 R1.1 "<what you broke>" FILE...(task:taskK) (it undoes the break); then check the file is unchanged. With two or more rules, run the breaks side by side: make one, queue it withvbw mutate P1.2 R1.1 --queue "<what you broke>" FILE...(it sets the break aside and undoes it at once, running nothing), check the file is unchanged, make the next; thenvbw mutate P1.2 --runruns every queued break at once and prints each result. It may run past one shell command's 10-minute limit: if Claude Code moves it to the background, wait for it to finish and read its whole output before anything else. A task break runs the checks of the plan's own rules (those naming it, plus every rule of a requirement it completes). If an owed check is still red, make it pass and commit, or narrow with--check ID, or record--none "<reason naming the completing plan>". A task with nothing to break:vbw mutate P1.2 taskK --none "<reason>". The rule formvbw mutate P1.2 R1.1 --none "<reason>"only for a rule whose check reads nothing the requirement's plans build (a check that judges the record, for example); the kernel verifies it from the check's read list and refuses otherwise, naming the files to break the rule in. - A survivor (checks stay green): strengthen the approved check file of that rule's own requirement in place, never another requirement's, never weaken an assertion; commit it with the plan (
vbw commit P1.2 "<msg>" FILE); re-run the same break until red;notessay the strengthened file waits for one approval. - Two strengthening attempts that stay green:
vbw plan block P1.2 "<rule, what you tried>".
- Standard and deep: break the plan's own code once for each rule (
- Formatters touch your files only (
cargo fmt -- <files>,prettier --write <files>): check files are approved byte for byte. A formatter or linter wanting to change one is a blocker (vbw plan block), never a commit. Edits to a check file wait for one approval: say so innotes. - Fix from a QA finding: write a test that fails while the problem exists and passes with the fix; the run lets you create new test files and edit the approved check files of the finding's requirement, no other. Put the regression case in the existing check file of the finding's requirement (its check runs it); a new test file only when the requirement has none: register it with
vbw fix check F1(a check document on stdin:run,files), commit it with the fix. New or changed check files wait for one user approval before the proof: say so innotes, never approve.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 61 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 45232365aa5c
dev is an agent published in the GitHub repository swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw (85 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,742 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-22.
Other agents, from other repositories
builder
Implements a scoped feature or fix test-first with the smallest passing change, verified by the project's checks. Use when the design is settled and code needs writing.
tl-test-writer
Team-loop test writer for a regulated work package. Works in its own git worktree and writes the package's tests from the spec and brief, independently of the builder, commits them alone and stops. Use at step 5 of the team loop for regulated packages only. Never writes implementation.
surgical-pr-fix
Fixes exactly one failing CI test on a PR branch — smallest possible diff, verified by running only the failing test file, then commits and pushes to the PR branch.
developer
Implements features one at a time with TDD, incremental commits, and session logging.
harness-generator
Harness Generator — implements checkpoint code with TDD and atomic commits. Use when harness orchestrator needs code generation for a checkpoint.
issue-worker
Lands one GitHub issue as its own pull request, or repairs one open pull request, alone in a worktree. Spawned by github-flow:dispatch and github-flow:shift.