Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/systempromptio/systemprompt-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/systempromptio/systemprompt-template/frontend_impl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/systempromptio/systemprompt-template/frontend_impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/systempromptio/systemprompt-template/frontend_impl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/systempromptio/systemprompt-template/frontend_impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/systempromptio/systemprompt-template/frontend_impl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01101 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00440 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
frontend_impl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 6f582c46212d
frontend_impl is an agent published in the GitHub repository systempromptio/systemprompt-template (29 stars, last pushed 13d ago), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,101 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
planner
Planning gateway for multi-agent Bindu collaboration.
agente-00c-clarify-answerer
Subagente: aplica heuristica score 0..3 sobre 3 fontes (briefing, constitutionprojeto, stacksugerida) para responder perguntas do clarify-asker autonomamente. Score >=2 decide; score 0 pausa humano.
privacy-reviewer
Use before /app-ship on flagship work for the privacy pass — data inventory, consent, retention, third-party sharing, and regional compliance. Distinct evidence set from security. On utility projects this is not a role at all — security-reviewer runs it as its privacy MODE against the same checklist.
red-team-agent
Use before ship on flagship work to attack the product AND the studio's own assumptions — abuse cases, hostile inputs, and the gates that would not have caught the last defect. Conditional role. Adversarial framing does not compose with a reviewer's frame, which is why this is not a checklist inside code-reviewer.
factory-ci-doctor
Diagnostician for one red GitHub Actions run. Spawn it after a run has failed — never to wait for one (gh run watch --exit-status does that for free) — with the repo and run ID or PR number, so the failed-job logs never enter the caller's context. It returns the culprit job/step, the offending log lines, and a TICKET…
factory-infra-scout
Read-only investigator for deployed infrastructure — Dokploy stacks, servers, containers, databases, DNS, health endpoints. Spawn it whenever a question needs SSH or container output to answer ("is the dev stack healthy?", "what is env var X on the deployed app?", "did the deploy pick up the new image?", "why is smoke…