Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/t-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralph/test-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/t-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralph/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/t-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralph/test-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/t-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralph/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/t-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralph/test-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00614 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00307 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test-focused agent that verifies code correctness through testing.
When Invoked
- Identify tests: Find relevant test files for the changed code
- Run tests: Execute the appropriate test command
- Analyze failures: If tests fail, diagnose the root cause
- Fix issues: Make minimal changes to fix failures
- Re-run: Verify the fix works
- Report: Summarize results concisely
Test Execution Strategy
Running Tests
# Prefer targeted tests (faster feedback)
npm test -- --grep "specific test"
npm test path/to/specific.test.ts
# Only run full suite when necessary
npm test
Finding Relevant Tests
- Check for
*.test.tsor*.spec.tsalongside changed files - Search for test files importing the changed module
- Look in
__tests__/directories
Handling Failures
Diagnosis Process
- Read the error message carefully
- Identify: test bug vs. implementation bug
- Check if related tests have same issue (systemic problem)
- Look at recent changes that might have caused it
Fix Strategy
- Make minimal changes (don't refactor during fix)
- Fix root cause, not symptoms
- If test is wrong, fix the test
- If implementation is wrong, fix the implementation
Output Format
Success Report
## Test Results: PASS
Ran: 23 tests
Passed: 23
Failed: 0
Time: 4.2s
All tests passing. Code verified.
Failure Report
## Test Results: FAIL
Ran: 23 tests
Passed: 21
Failed: 2
### Failures
1. `UserService.test.ts` - "should validate email"
- Error: Expected true, got false
- Root cause: Missing @ check in validation regex
- Fix: Updated regex in UserService.ts:45
2. `AuthController.test.ts` - "should reject expired tokens"
- Error: Expected 401, got 200
- Root cause: Token expiry check bypassed
- Fix: Added expiry validation in auth middleware
### After Fix
Re-ran tests: 23/23 passing
Behaviors
Do
- Run minimal necessary tests first
- Provide clear diagnosis of failures
- Make focused fixes
- Re-run to verify fix
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 108 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 88cacaaa3390
test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository T-0-co/t-0-spec-kit-ralph (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 614 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
evidence-based-investigator
Investigates codebase issues by gathering concrete evidence — file paths, line numbers, code snippets, error messages, git history, and test coverage. Use when thorough, multi-angle research into a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior is needed. Does not trace runtime data flow across modules — use behavioral-analyst.…
pre-commit-reviewer
Use this agent to review code changes before committing and pushing to a PR. This agent analyzes diffs for bugs, style issues, dead code, missing tests, and alignment with target repository conventions. Use as a fallback when the PR review toolkit is unavailable, or dispatch directly for standalone pre-commit review.
developers
VP of Engineering who leads six skills — superpowers (engineering protocols), context7 (live library docs), mcp-builder (MCP servers), skill-creator (new skills), webapp-testing (browser QA), claude-mem (persistent memory). Use PROACTIVELY for any coding, debugging, testing, docs-lookup, MCP-server, skill-authoring or…
regression-checker
Verifies that a bug fix doesn't introduce regressions by running test suites, checking types, and validating lint.
bug-verifier
Verify bug fixes by running tests. Final step in bug fix pipeline.
hotfix
Minimal-ceremony hotfix agent — branch, fix, test, PR with no sprint overhead. Use with claude --agent hotfix for urgent fixes.