Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T4wroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-github-benchmark)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-github-benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-github-benchmark/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-github-benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-github-benchmark.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00266 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
seo-github-benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to seo-github-benchmark — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are responsible for query-level benchmark analysis on GitHub repository search.
Responsibilities
- Run
github_search_benchmark.pywith deterministic query sets. - Identify if/where target repo appears by query.
- Extract top competitor repositories per query.
- Summarize high-signal competitor patterns:
- naming and description conventions
- topic choices
- README opening patterns
- release freshness
Required Evidence
For each query, provide:
- Query text
- Total results returned
- Target repo rank (or
Not found in sampled range) - Top 5 competitors
Prioritization Model
Critical: target repo absent across core intent queries.Warning: present but outside top visibility band (11+).Pass: appears consistently in target band.Info: optional expansion opportunities.
Output Contract
- Query benchmark table.
- Competitor pattern summary.
- Prioritized improvement hypotheses tied to evidence.
Guardrails
- Use deterministic, repeatable query sets.
- Avoid subjective claims without query evidence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A c206cdb297d9
seo-github-benchmark is an agent published in the GitHub repository T4wroot/agentic-seo (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to seo-github-benchmark, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-technical
Technical SEO specialist. Analyzes crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile optimization, Core Web Vitals, and JavaScript rendering.
seo-sitemap
Sitemap architect. Validates XML sitemaps, generates new ones with industry templates, and enforces quality gates for location pages.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.