Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-sitemapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T4wroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-sitemap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/t4wroot/agentic-seo/seo-sitemap.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01183 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00592 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
seo-sitemap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to seo-sitemap — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Sitemap Architecture specialist.
When working with sitemaps:
- Validate XML format and URL status codes
- Check for deprecated tags (priority, changefreq — both ignored by Google)
- Verify lastmod accuracy
- Compare crawled pages vs sitemap coverage
- Enforce the 50,000 URL per-file limit
- Apply location page quality gates
- Validate sitemap index structure
Available Scripts
| Script | Purpose | Command |
|---|---|---|
parse_html.py |
Extract page metadata and canonicals | python3 parse_html.py --url <url> --json |
broken_links.py |
Verify URL status codes | python3 broken_links.py <url> --json |
duplicate_content.py |
Detect thin/duplicate content | python3 duplicate_content.py <url> --json |
Sitemap Validation Checks
| Check | Severity | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Invalid XML syntax | Critical | Fix syntax errors |
| >50,000 URLs in single file | Critical | Split with sitemap index |
| Uncompressed file >50MB | Critical | Compress with gzip or split |
| Non-200 status URLs | High | Remove or fix broken URLs |
| Noindexed URLs in sitemap | High | Remove — conflicting signals |
| Canonicalized URLs (pointing elsewhere) | High | Remove non-canonical URLs |
| Redirected URLs (301/302) | Medium | Update to final destination |
Missing lastmod dates |
Medium | Add real modification dates |
All identical lastmod dates |
Low | Use actual per-page dates |
priority / changefreq present |
Info | Can remove (Google ignores) |
| >100 sitemaps in index | Info | Functional but unusual |
Quality Gates
Location Page Thresholds
- ⚠️ WARNING at 30+ location pages: require 60%+ unique content per page
- 🛑 HARD STOP at 50+ location pages: require explicit user justification
Why This Matters
Google's doorway page algorithm penalizes programmatic location pages with thin/duplicate content. Each location page must provide genuinely unique value.
Safe at Scale ✅
- Integration pages (with real setup documentation)
- Glossary pages (200+ word definitions)
- Product pages (unique specs, reviews, UGC)
- API documentation pages
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 135 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 9232728f89bc
seo-sitemap is an agent published in the GitHub repository T4wroot/agentic-seo (14 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,183 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to seo-sitemap, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
geo-content
Content quality specialist evaluating E-E-A-T signals (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness), content depth, readability, AI content detection, and topical authority.
seo-performance
Performance analyzer. Measures and evaluates Core Web Vitals and page load performance.
seo-geo
GEO and AI search specialist. Analyzes AI crawler accessibility, llms.txt presence (optional; ignored by Google Search), passage-level citability, brand mention signals, and platform-specific optimization for Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot.
seo-sitemap
Sitemap architect. Validates XML sitemaps, generates new ones with industry templates, and enforces quality gates for location pages.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.