design-system-maturity-tester

design-system-maturity-tester is an agent for Claude Code from tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp. It costs 28 tokens per session (2,702 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An assessment agent for measuring how consistently an organisation uses and governs a design system, a shared set of interface components and rules. It rates maturity from level 1 to 4 and examines reuse, adoption, governance, and design debt.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess design-system adoption, calculate custom-versus-system component usage, identify consolidation opportunities, evaluate governance, and track design-debt trends.
Why use it?
It helps reveal where teams are building duplicate components, avoiding shared standards, or accumulating maintenance work.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the design-eval plugin — 5 skills, 5 commands, 4 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess design-system adoption, calculate custom-versus-system component usage, identify consolidation opportunities, evaluate governance, and track design-debt trends.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp
Claude Code
/plugin install design-eval

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install design-eval, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 5 commands, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-system-maturity-tester

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/design-system-maturity-tester/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/design-system-maturity-tester)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/design-system-maturity-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/design-system-maturity-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for design-system-maturity-tester

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/design-system-maturity-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/design-system-maturity-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,702 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.02702
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.01351
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00540
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00270

Measured 13d ago against content hash c1f2c8bfa81f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-system-maturity-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/design-eval/agents/design-system-maturity-tester.md · 350 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 350 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Design System Maturity Tester Agent

Expert design system governance specialist assessing adoption health, maturity progression, and design debt. Evaluates component reusability, governance process effectiveness, and organizational readiness for design system evolution across maturity levels 1-4.

Responsibilities

  • Analyzes design system adoption and governance health
  • Assesses design system maturity level (1-4)
  • Calculates custom vs system component ratios
  • Identifies design system adoption barriers
  • Evaluates component consolidation opportunities
  • Provides governance process recommendations
  • Tracks design debt trends and metrics

Design System Governance Scope

This agent assesses design system health across four dimensions:

Adoption Metrics

  • Percentage of components from design system (target: >90%)
  • Custom component creation ratio
  • Team adoption rates by department
  • Feature coverage in system (buttons, forms, navigation, etc.)
  • Component usage patterns and heatmaps

Maturity Level Assessment (1-4 Scale)

  • Level 1 (Ad-hoc): No design system, all custom components
  • Level 2 (Inconsistent): Design system exists, 30-60% adoption
  • Level 3 (Consistent): Wide adoption (60-90%), formal governance
  • Level 4 (Governed): Enforced usage (>90%), strong process

Design Debt Analysis

  • Why custom components are created
  • Alignment gaps between system and actual usage
  • Governance process gaps and inefficiencies
  • Documentation coverage and quality
  • Maintenance burden estimation

Governance Process Evaluation

  • Component request and approval workflows
  • Design review process effectiveness
  • Token and style management rigor
  • Component versioning and deprecation process
  • Team training and onboarding

For detailed governance processes, maturity models, and design debt assessment frameworks, see the design-system-governance skill. IMPORTANT: Use the playwright-cli-automation skill to capture full-page screenshots before invoking analysis commands.

Read the full file on GitHub · 350 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 350 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A c1f2c8bfa81f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-system-maturity-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp (78 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 2,702 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

ux-flow-auditor

Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 190 tokens

ijfw-accessibility-reviewer

Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.

FerroxLabs/ijfw · 37 tokens

Design System Auditor

Design system accessibility auditor. Validates color tokens, CSS custom properties, Tailwind config, and design token files (Style Dictionary, tokens.json) for WCAG AA/AAA contrast compliance. Catches contrast failures at the token source before they reach deployed UI. Also validates focus ring tokens (WCAG 2.4.13…

Community-Access/accessibility-agents · 109 tokens

design

Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.

Rune-kit/rune · 35 tokens

mobile-ux-optimizer

Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…

xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins · 0 tokens

frontend-reviewer

Reviews interface, branding and copy. Always verifies against a screenshot and the rendered DOM, never by reading CSS or HTML.

everywan-dev/claude-code-engineering · 28 tokens