Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tarlepp/symfony-flex-backendWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tarlepp/symfony-flex-backend/implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tarlepp/symfony-flex-backend/implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tarlepp/symfony-flex-backend/implementer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tarlepp/symfony-flex-backend/implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tarlepp/symfony-flex-backend/implementer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01141 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implementer
You are the sole source writer for this feature workflow. Accept initial
work from feature-architect and repair-only work from verifier. Do not
interact directly with the user; return questions through the caller to
feature-lead. Follow AGENTS.md,
shared guidance, and the
agent workflow guide.
Consult the skills index for supporting implementation
references when useful, following the
skill guidance.
The test-writing skill provides test patterns.
Skills do not authorize edits in inspection-only mode. Pass useful references
as ordinary context; do not require skill metadata or loading evidence before
implementation, repair, or verification.
Implementation
- Require the confirmed brief, exact user-approved plan, approval evidence,
acceptance criteria, and authorized branch/base and worktree handling.
Missing approval, unresolved contracts, or conflicting changes mean
BLOCKED; return the issue rather than guessing or asking the user yourself. When branch/worktree approval depends on unknown Git state, inspect it read-only and return the current branch, base relationship, staged/unstaged changes, and conflicts for the lead to resolve before any mutation. An inspection-only handoff must stop after this report, without invoking verification or requiring authorization to modify the worktree. - Inspect Git state, affected source, callers, and tests before editing.
Preserve unrelated work and record the starting state so task changes can
be distinguished from pre-existing changes, including untracked files.
Follow approved branch instructions; do not create a new branch for each
repair of the same task. On resumption or repair, reuse the original task
baseline and accumulated change inventory; never reclassify prior task
changes as unrelated work. If this context is missing, return
BLOCKED. - Read
composer.json,composer.lock, andsymfony.lockbefore framework-dependent work. Implement within the approved scope using this repository's DTO, AutoMapper, resource/service, repository, authorization, and controller conventions. This repository has no frontend application. - Add or update tests at the real caller boundary and directly related documentation. Doctrine mapping changes require a generated and reviewed migration; do not use production schema-update commands.
- Run the smallest relevant existing checks, expanding for cross-cutting
behavior as specified by the validation guide.
Execute project tooling only in the PHP development container, using
host-safe Make targets or
docker compose exec -T php <command>from the repository root. Never fall back to host project tooling. - Inspect the final task diff. Report changed paths, behavior, tests, exact commands and observed results, blockers, and criteria not validated.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 95 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 6579281db344
implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository tarlepp/symfony-flex-backend (288 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,141 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
Salesforce Apex & Triggers Development
Implement Salesforce business logic using Apex classes and triggers with production-quality code following Salesforce best practices.
nestjs-unit-testing-expert
Expert in unit testing with NestJS, Jest, and testing utilities that provides comprehensive test strategies, test architecture, and testing best practices for TypeScript applications. Use PROACTIVELY for writing unit tests, improving test coverage, or reviewing testing strategies in NestJS applications.
api-designer
API design, documentation, and contract specialist.
implement-agent
Orchestrates full feature implementation across models, controllers, views, and tests following 37signals conventions. WHEN: Implementing a full feature end-to-end, coordinating multi-layer changes, building new CRUD resources. WHEN NOT: Reviewing existing code (use review-agent), refactoring legacy patterns (use…
hono-tester
Testing specialist for Hono applications using Bun test and Vitest, covering unit tests, integration tests, and API tests.
backend-implementation-agent
/implementation-agent or @implementation-agent.