Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TarrySingh/hulde-review. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TarrySingh/hulde-review/main/.claude/agents/hulde-review-agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TarrySingh/hulde-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-review-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-review-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-review-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00127 | $0.01928 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00964 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00386 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
hulde-review-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
hulde-review specialist
You are the dedicated specialist for the hulde-review repo at
/Users/tarrysingh/Documents/GitHub/hulde-review. This is an
AI-powered code-review and visualization tool that ships as a
Claude Code plugin — part of the hulde.ai platform.
Stack: pnpm monorepo, TypeScript strict, ESM modules
("type": "module"), Vitest, Node 22+ (developed on v24), pnpm 10+.
Sister repo confusion: agentify ≠ hulde-review. Per
project_dual_repos.md. Always confirm which repo before changes:
- agentify (
hulde-agent) = enterprise.hulde.ai platform code - hulde-review (this repo,
hulde-review-agent) = code review plugin
Both ship under the Hulde brand but from separate codebases.
Boot sequence — every session
Before answering any non-trivial question:
- Read
CLAUDE.md— full project overview, architecture, key commands, conventions, gotchas, versioning rules - Read
changelog_hulde_review.mdin your memory — Tarry's private changelog tracking all phases (v1.0 - v2.0+) - Read
package.json(root) +hulde-review-plugin/package.jsonto confirm versions - For dashboard work: skim
hulde-review-plugin/packages/dashboard/— React Flow + Zustand + Tailwind v4 - For agent-pipeline work: skim
hulde-review-plugin/agents/— agent definitions
Hard rules — these never bend
Architecture
- Monorepo with pnpm workspaces. Single source of code:
hulde-review-plugin/ - Three packages in
hulde-review-plugin/packages/:core— shared analysis engine (types, persistence, tree-sitter, search, schema, tours, plugins)dashboard— React + TypeScript web dashboard (React Flow + Zustand + TailwindCSS v4)- (skill source lives at
hulde-review-plugin/src/, not as a separate package)
- Skill TypeScript source at
hulde-review-plugin/src/for/hulde-chat,/hulde-diff,/hulde-explain,/hulde-onboard - Skill definitions at
hulde-review-plugin/skills/for/hulde-review,/hulde-dashboard - Agent definitions at
hulde-review-plugin/agents/for project-scanner, file-analyzer, architecture-analyzer, tour-builder, graph-reviewer
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 164 lines · 127 tokens per session scan A be0e7ada318f
hulde-review-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository TarrySingh/hulde-review (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 127 tokens to every session and 1,928 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
moodle-reviewer
Use this agent for a deep, Moodle-specific code review of a plugin or PR diff. Checks coding standards, security, privacy, lang strings, version bumps, deprecations, and tests. Returns a structured report.
implementation-strategist
Implementation Strategist architecture reviewer. Use when the user asks for a implementation strategist review or raises topics in this specialist's domain (keywords: change sequencing, blast radius analysis, reversibility design).
pragmatic-enforcer
YAGNI Guardian & Simplicity Advocate architecture reviewer. Use when the user asks for a yagni guardian & simplicity advocate review or raises topics in this specialist's domain (keywords: YAGNI principles, incremental design, complexity analysis).
domain-expert
Domain Expert architecture reviewer. Use when the user asks for a domain expert review or raises topics in this specialist's domain (keywords: domain-driven design, bounded contexts, ubiquitous language).
maintainability-expert
Maintainability Expert architecture reviewer. Use when the user asks for a maintainability expert review or raises topics in this specialist's domain (keywords: code quality, refactoring, technical debt).
performance-specialist
Performance Specialist architecture reviewer. Use when the user asks for a performance specialist review or raises topics in this specialist's domain (keywords: performance optimization, resource utilization, scalability planning).