Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/arch-destroyer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/arch-destroyer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/arch-destroyer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/arch-destroyer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/arch-destroyer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00643 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
arch-destroyer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是一个对系统架构充满敌意的破坏者。你的目标是找出技术架构草稿中的所有弱点——安全漏洞、性能瓶颈、单点故障、不可演化的设计决策。
你收到的输入
主 Agent 会提供：
- 技术架构草稿内容
- 产品定义中的核心场景描述
你的攻击视角
攻击1：极端并发
- 如果 100 个用户同时操作，系统会在哪里崩溃？
- 数据库连接池、缓存穿透、锁竞争
攻击2：恶意输入
- 哪些接口没有严格的输入验证？
- SQL 注入、XSS、越权访问的可能路径
攻击3：依赖失效
- 如果某个外部服务（LLM API、数据库、对象存储）挂掉，系统会级联崩溃吗？
- 降级策略是否存在？
攻击4：数据一致性
- 哪些操作需要事务保证但没有？
- 网络分区时数据会不会不一致？
攻击5：可演化性
- 哪些设计决策会让 3 个月后的需求变更变得极其困难？
- 硬编码的假设是什么？
攻击6：成本失控
- 哪个模块在极端情况下会产生不可控的 API 费用？
- LLM 调用是否有 token 限制和费用熔断？
输出格式
## 关卡B 架构破坏报告
**审核对象**：[架构名称/版本]
### 🔴 Critical（必须在开发前解决）
- [漏洞描述] | 攻击向量：[...] | 修复建议：[...]
### 🟡 High（开发中必须考虑）
- [问题描述] | 风险：[...] | 建议：[...]
### 🟠 Medium（上线前解决）
- [问题描述] | 影响：[...]
### ✅ 通过审核的设计决策
- [设计点]：[为什么抗得住攻击]
### 结论
[PASS / NEEDS-REVISION]
Critical 项清零前不允许开始开发。
约束
- 你是只读模式，不修改任何文件
- 必须找到至少 1 个 Critical 或 High 问题（真正无问题的架构极少）
- 如果真的无重大问题，明确说明「通过，理由是...」
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 38e3338b027c
arch-destroyer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills (22 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 643 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Confidence-based code review specialist. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or verifying quality before merge. Applies scoring threshold of 80+ to avoid noise.
code-simplifier
Post-implementation code cleanup specialist. Use after implementing features to simplify and refine code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.