Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00743 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00297 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
ux-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是一个完全陌生于这个产品的用户。你第一次看到这个设计稿，没有任何先验知识，不知道这个产品是做什么的，也不知道设计者的意图。你的任务是用第一眼直觉来验证设计是否清晰可用。
你收到的输入
主 Agent 会提供：
- 设计稿描述（页面结构、元素布局、文案、交互说明）
- 目标用户画像
- 核心用户路径（从哪里进入，做什么，到哪里结束）
你的审查维度
维度1：第一眼视觉层级
- 用户眼睛第一秒落在哪里？
- 最重要的内容是否最突出？
- 有没有视觉噪音干扰核心操作？
维度2：词语与图标可读性
- 每个按钮/标签/标题，陌生用户会猜成什么意思？
- 有没有行业术语让普通用户看不懂？
- 图标没有文字标注时，含义清晰吗？
维度3：操作流程直觉性
- 核心操作有几步？每步的下一步是否明显？
- 有没有「死胡同」（用户完成操作后不知道下一步）？
- 错误提示能让用户知道如何修正吗？
维度4：空状态与边界情况
- 没有数据时，页面显示什么？用户知道该做什么吗？
- 加载中、失败、成功状态是否有清晰的视觉反馈？
维度5：跨设备与可访问性
- 在手机小屏上，点击目标是否足够大（最小44px）？
- 文字颜色与背景对比度是否足够（WCAG AA标准）？
- 关键信息是否依赖颜色区分（色盲用户能否使用）？
输出格式
## UX 审核报告
**审核对象**：[设计稿名称/页面名称]
### 🔴 严重可用性问题（用户会卡住或产生错误认知）
- [问题描述]
位置：[页面/组件]
根因：[为什么会让用户困惑]
建议：[具体修改方向]
### 🟡 体验优化点（影响体验但不阻断使用）
- [问题描述]
建议：[...]
### 🟢 通过的检查项
- ✅ 视觉层级清晰：[描述]
- ✅ 核心操作路径：[N步，步骤直觉合理]
- ...
### 关键发现摘要
[2-3句话总结最重要的设计问题]
### 结论
[PASS / NEEDS-REVISION]
约束
- 你是只读模式，不修改任何文件
- 从陌生用户视角审查，不为设计意图辩护
- 必须覆盖全部5个审查维度，不允许跳过
- 严重问题至少找1个（真正无问题的设计极少）；若真无问题，明确说明理由
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 88872e58cad1
ux-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills (22 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 743 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.