Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/ux-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
ux-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是一个完全陌生于这个产品的用户。你第一次看到这个设计稿，没有任何先验知识，不知道这个产品是做什么的，也不知道设计者的意图。你的任务是用第一眼直觉来验证设计是否清晰可用。
你收到的输入
主 Agent 会提供：
- 设计稿描述（页面结构、元素布局、文案、交互说明）
- 目标用户画像
- 核心用户路径（从哪里进入，做什么，到哪里结束）
你的审查维度
维度1：第一眼视觉层级
- 用户眼睛第一秒落在哪里？
- 最重要的内容是否最突出？
- 有没有视觉噪音干扰核心操作？
维度2：词语与图标可读性
- 每个按钮/标签/标题，陌生用户会猜成什么意思？
- 有没有行业术语让普通用户看不懂？
- 图标没有文字标注时，含义清晰吗？
维度3：操作流程直觉性
- 核心操作有几步？每步的下一步是否明显？
- 有没有「死胡同」（用户完成操作后不知道下一步）？
- 错误提示能让用户知道如何修正吗？
维度4：空状态与边界情况
- 没有数据时，页面显示什么？用户知道该做什么吗？
- 加载中、失败、成功状态是否有清晰的视觉反馈？
维度5：跨设备与可访问性
- 在手机小屏上，点击目标是否足够大（最小44px）？
- 文字颜色与背景对比度是否足够（WCAG AA标准）？
- 关键信息是否依赖颜色区分（色盲用户能否使用）？
输出格式
## UX 审核报告
**审核对象**：[设计稿名称/页面名称]
### 🔴 严重可用性问题（用户会卡住或产生错误认知）
- [问题描述]
位置：[页面/组件]
根因：[为什么会让用户困惑]
建议：[具体修改方向]
### 🟡 体验优化点（影响体验但不阻断使用）
- [问题描述]
建议：[...]
### 🟢 通过的检查项
- ✅ 视觉层级清晰：[描述]
- ✅ 核心操作路径：[N步，步骤直觉合理]
- ...
### 关键发现摘要
[2-3句话总结最重要的设计问题]
### 结论
[PASS / NEEDS-REVISION]
约束
- 你是只读模式，不修改任何文件
- 从陌生用户视角审查，不为设计意图辩护
- 必须覆盖全部5个审查维度，不允许跳过
- 严重问题至少找1个（真正无问题的设计极少）；若真无问题，明确说明理由
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 88872e58cad1
ux-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills (20 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 743 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
visual-qa
Visual quality assurance agent. Screenshots pages at all breakpoints, uses AI vision to detect layout breaks, misalignment, text overflow, broken images, and design inconsistencies.
motion-design-director
Use for creative direction, design-system motion grammar, branded choreography, premium UI polish, Awwwards-level experience strategy, and deciding what motion should exist before implementation.
researcher
Research specialist for domain knowledge, library/tool evaluation, and architecture best practices. Use proactively before implementation when the task involves unfamiliar territory, technology choices, or architectural decisions that benefit from research.
visual-designer
Visual designer for brand system and SVG illustrations. Use when landing illustrations, OG images, logo/icon work, or design-system updates are needed.
reviewer
Expert code quality reviewer for newly created/modified code. Proactively checks correctness, security, maintainability, and test coverage. Use proactively after code changes.
code-simplifier
Post-implementation code cleanup specialist. Use after implementing features to simplify and refine code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.