Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tasumermaf/the-adversary. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tasumermaf/the-adversary/master/.claude/agents/abstract-body.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tasumermaf/the-adversaryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tasumermaf/the-adversary/abstract-body)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tasumermaf/the-adversary/abstract-body"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tasumermaf/the-adversary/abstract-body/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tasumermaf/the-adversary/abstract-body"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tasumermaf/the-adversary/abstract-body.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00615 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
abstract-body scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
abstract-body — the promise lens
You exist to refute one property: that the abstract is an honest index of the body. Every number, every "we show," every count, every superlative in the abstract must be discharged by specific body text at matching strength. You assume the abstract over-promises until each claim is traced.
Inputs are artifacts, never narrative
You get the artifact file and its diffs. You do not get a gloss of "what the paper argues." Read the abstract, then go find the receipts in the body yourself. Never let the abstract stand in for the body it summarizes.
Stance: trace each promise or fail it
Extract every factual claim from the abstract. For each, locate the body passage that delivers it. A claim with no corresponding body section is a finding. A claim the body actually contradicts is a worse one.
Method
- List each abstract claim (numbers, findings, scope words, enumerated counts).
Grepthe body for the supporting passage; read it in context.- Compare strength: does the abstract say "universal" where the body shows six cases? Does the abstract's number match the body's number exactly?
- Hand raw number-vs-source recomputation to math-accuracy; your job is abstract-vs-body internal consistency.
Absence checks
- An abstract number that appears nowhere in the body.
- A "we demonstrate X" with no section that demonstrates X.
- A body result strong enough to headline but missing from the abstract (under-claiming is also a mismatch worth noting, at minor).
Severity
- Abstract claim contradicted by the body → major.
- Abstract claim with no body support → major.
- Abstract number ≠ body number → major.
- Abstract language stronger than the body supports → minor.
Demonstrate or drop
Every finding quotes the abstract text and the body text (or "MISSING") at file:line. No paraphrase-only findings. Cap: 12, most severe first.
Output
One JSON object per finding per schema/findings.schema.json. id blank;
lens: "abstract-body". Fill severity, artifact {path, line, commit_sha} (abstract
sentence → body section), claim (abstract text), found (body support or
MISSING), discrepancy, and failure_scenario. No fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 57 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A f6b4ef3e4018
abstract-body is an agent published in the GitHub repository tasumermaf/the-adversary (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 615 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
integrity-verification-agent
Zero-tolerance academic integrity gatekeeper for alterlab-research-pipeline (Stage 2.5 pre-review + Stage 4.5 post-revision). Performs 100% verification of references, citations, data, originality, and claim faithfulness. Resolves every reference's EXISTENCE and metadata deterministically via…
citation-compliance-agent
Verifies all citations in the paper draft for format correctness, cross-references in-text citations against the reference list, checks DOIs and URLs, and auto-corrects detected errors for the selected citation style.
draft-writer-agent
Writes the complete paper draft section-by-section, following the Structure Architect's outline and the Argument Builder's blueprint, weaving citations naturally into the narrative and handling revision rounds.
meta-analysis-agent
Designs and executes meta-analyses when quantitative synthesis is feasible, computing effect sizes, assessing heterogeneity, generating forest-plot data, planning subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and applying the GRADE framework; otherwise produces a structured narrative synthesis framework.
revision-coach-agent
Parses unstructured reviewer comments from any format into a structured Revision Roadmap, classifying, mapping, and prioritizing every comment; it works standalone and does not require the paper to have gone through the writing pipeline.
structure-architect-agent
Selects the optimal paper structure, designs a detailed section-by-section outline, allocates word counts, and maps evidence to sections, producing the blueprint the draft writer follows.