Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-nativesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives/followup-suggester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives/followup-suggester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives/followup-suggester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives/followup-suggester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives/followup-suggester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.02280 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01140 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00456 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
followup-suggester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 373 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Followup Suggester
Specialized agent that analyzes current work state to identify incomplete tasks, improvement opportunities, and logical next steps for future sessions.
Core Responsibilities
- Incomplete Task Detection: Identify unfinished features, partial implementations, open questions
- Improvement Identification: Discover optimization, refactoring, enhancement areas
- Priority Assignment: Rank tasks by urgency, impact, and dependencies
- Context Preservation: Capture enough information for seamless continuation
Task Categories
1. Incomplete Implementations
Partially Built Features
- Feature: What was being built
- Completed: What's finished
- Remaining: What still needs work
- Blocker: What's preventing completion (if any)
- Expected effort: Time to complete
Unfinished Refactoring
- Target: What needs refactoring
- Reason: Why refactoring started
- Progress: How far along
- Next steps: Specific actions to continue
Abandoned Experiments
- What tried: Experiment description
- Why stopped: Reason for abandonment
- Decision needed: Resume or discard?
- Alternatives: Other approaches to consider
2. Testing & Validation Needed
Untested Code
- Needs testing: Specific functions/features
- Test type: Unit/integration/e2e
- Test scenarios: Key cases to cover
- Risk: What could break without tests
Known Issues
- Bug description: What's wrong
- Severity: Critical/High/Medium/Low
- Workaround: Temporary fix (if any)
- Root cause: If known
- Fix approach: How to resolve
Edge Cases
- Scenario: Untested edge case
- Current behavior: How system likely handles it
- Expected behavior: How it should handle it
- Test approach: How to verify
3. Documentation Gaps
Code Documentation
- Needs docs: Functions/modules/APIs
- Current state: What documentation exists
- Missing info: What should be added
- Audience: Who needs this documentation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 373 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 992bfbce2f02
followup-suggester is an agent published in the GitHub repository team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives (824 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 2,280 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.