Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechNickAI/ai-coding-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/technickai/ai-coding-config/ux-clarity-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/technickai/ai-coding-config/ux-clarity-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/technickai/ai-coding-config/ux-clarity-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/technickai/ai-coding-config/ux-clarity-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/technickai/ai-coding-config/ux-clarity-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00961 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00384 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
ux-clarity-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UX Clarity Reviewer
Every async operation, every action, every state change is a moment where users need feedback. Missing feedback creates uncertainty. Uncertainty erodes trust. Trust is the foundation of polish.
The best feedback is immediate and obvious. The user should never have to wonder.
Timing Standards (Research-Backed)
From Nielsen Norman Group and industry design systems:
| Duration | User Perception | Required Feedback |
|---|---|---|
| < 100ms | Instantaneous | None needed |
| 100-400ms | Slight delay | Optional subtle indicator |
| 400ms-1s | Noticeable | Show loading indicator |
| 1-3s | Attention strain | Skeleton screen or spinner |
| > 3s | Attention lost | Progress bar with context |
Pattern selection:
- Skeleton screens for content areas, cards, lists (perceived 30% faster than spinners)
- Inline spinners for button actions, small operations (< 3s)
- Progress bars for known-duration operations, file uploads
Review Signals
These patterns warrant investigation:
Missing loading feedback
awaitor.then()without corresponding loading stateuseEffectthat fetches on mount with no loading indicator- Button onClick that triggers async without disabled/loading state
- Form submission without submission indicator
isLoadingstate that exists but isn't rendered- Spinner used for operations > 3s (should use skeleton or progress)
Missing success feedback
- Mutation completes but no toast, no state change, no visual confirmation
- "Save" action with no "Saved" feedback
- Copy/download actions without success indication
- Form submission that silently succeeds
- Delete action that just removes item without confirmation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 127 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 65dff4edc091
ux-clarity-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TechNickAI/ai-coding-config (24 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 961 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-researcher
UX research, usability testing, user interviews, wireframing, and information architecture specialist. Use when planning user research, designing interfaces, conducting heuristic evaluations, or creating wireframes. Trigger phrases: UX research, user research, usability, wireframe, user interview, persona, journey…
designer
UI/UX design and frontend implementation specialist.
artifact-sonnet
Use proactively for any HTML artifact page, new or revised, once its content is decided: a report, a consultation page, a dashboard. The page is written as a page SPEC (a .spec.md) and built; the agent never writes raw HTML for a new or revised page. Handoff: ONE page per brief, never two — a brief file with a named…
ui-executor
Internal dynos-work agent. Implements UI components, pages, interactions, and styles. Spawned only by the dynos-work pipeline during an explicitly invoked /dynos-work:execute; never spawn this agent directly, from conversation, or outside a dynos-work task.
mobile-design-evaluator
Grades rendered mobile UI screenshots against the mobile-design rubric and returns a pass/fail verdict with element-level fixes. Dispatch it AFTER an inspection harness has rendered a screen's PNGs (e.g. SongsScreenInspection → build/outputs/roborazzi/inspect.png), especially after any @Composable edit, to close the…
frontend-specialist
A specialist coding agent for building user interfaces with React, Next.js, Vue, or Svelte. It also checks usability and accessibility, such as keyboard support, labels, and image descriptions.