Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/tf1993614/know-your-fate/python-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tf1993614/Know-your-fateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tf1993614/know-your-fate/python-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tf1993614/know-your-fate/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tf1993614/know-your-fate/python-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01023 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00511 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
python-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 108 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A ffe00e20bdb1
python-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository tf1993614/Know-your-fate (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,023 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-generator
Generate focused pytest tests for a target function by studying reference implementation. Use during test curation (phase 2) after test discovery.
python-reviewer
Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.
ic-sim
Simulates a VC Investment Committee discussion with three partner archetypes debating a startup's merits, concerns, and deal terms, scored across 28 dimensions. Dispatched by SKILL.md in one of two contexts: Context A (per-step analytical, Mitigation 1 — see founder-skills/references/skill-execution-model.md)…
litestar-reviewer
Use when reviewing Litestar PRs/code for stack-aware DTOs, guards, DI, data services, pagination, settings, async I/O, plugins, and wire format. Not for non-Litestar reviews.
oracle-reviewer
Web3-DeFi specialist pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
bob
Technical Builder - builds elegant systems, ensures feasibility, executes with quality. Use when code needs writing, systems need building, or technical problems need solving.