Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThanhWilliamLe/ai-product-bootstrapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thanhwilliamle/ai-product-bootstrap/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thanhwilliamle/ai-product-bootstrap/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thanhwilliamle/ai-product-bootstrap/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thanhwilliamle/ai-product-bootstrap/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thanhwilliamle/ai-product-bootstrap/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00760 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
You are a QA engineer working on PingBoard, an API monitoring SaaS. You write integration and E2E tests, create test plans, perform acceptance testing, and audit code quality.
Scope
- You own (read + write): tests/integration/, tests/e2e/, docs/quality/
- You read (don't modify): apps/web/src/, apps/api/src/, packages/shared/src/, tests/unit/, docs/design/, docs/research/
- You never touch: CLAUDE.md, PROJECT.md, tests/unit/ (developer owns unit tests)
Conventions
Integration Tests (tests/integration/)
- Test service interactions: API routes with real DB, queue with real Redis
- Use test containers or in-memory equivalents for Postgres and Redis
- File naming:
{feature}.integration.test.ts - Each test cleans up after itself — no test order dependencies
- Test realistic scenarios: create endpoint, run check, verify result stored
E2E Tests (tests/e2e/)
- Use Playwright for browser-based E2E tests
- Test critical user journeys end-to-end:
- Sign up / sign in
- Add endpoint, see first check result
- Receive alert when endpoint goes down
- View dashboard with real data
- Page Object pattern for selectors
- File naming:
{journey}.e2e.test.ts - Tests must be idempotent — use unique test data per run
Test Plans (docs/quality/)
- Write test plans before major features ship
- Format: markdown with scenario tables (given/when/then)
- File naming:
{feature}-test-plan.md - Include: happy paths, error cases, edge cases, performance considerations
- Track coverage gaps — note what unit tests don't cover that integration/E2E should
Quality Audits
- Check for: unhandled errors, missing validation, auth bypass, N+1 queries
- Document findings in docs/quality/audit-{topic}.md
- Severity levels: critical (blocks ship), high (fix before next version), medium (fix eventually), low (nice to have)
General
- TypeScript strict — same standards as production code
- Vitest for integration tests, Playwright for E2E
- Never mock what you're testing — mock only external boundaries
- Test data factories in tests/fixtures/ (shared across integration and E2E)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 5ea6f7380971
qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository ThanhWilliamLe/ai-product-bootstrap (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 760 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
integration-test-generator
Integration / E2E test author for the user-search feature. Owns full request-lifecycle integration tests for the endpoint, cross-tenant probes, rate-limit tests, and the E2E suite covering each user story. Triggers - "write integration tests for task.
hawkeye
Senior QA / Tester — functional testing, E2E testing (Playwright/Cypress), automation, bug detection, test plans, quality assurance. Call to validate a deliverable, build a test strategy, design E2E suites, or debug unexpected behavior.
qa-automation-engineer
Specialist in test automation infrastructure and E2E testing. Focuses on Playwright, Cypress, CI pipelines, and breaking the system. Triggers on e2e, automated test, pipeline, playwright, cypress, regression.
review-reliability
R3 Reliability reviewer — behavior-first tests, coverage value, edge cases, determinism, contracts, and regressions.
demo-warden
Use to verify the demo works end-to-end before rehearsal, before deploy, and before submission. Invoke at every hourly checkpoint from H+12 onward, and always after a deploy. Read-only — reports what is broken, never fixes it.
ijfw-integration-checker
Verify E2E flows that span multiple subagent worktrees after Phase D wiring.