Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/the-teacher/active_harness/visiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/the-teacher/active_harnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01520 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00760 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00304 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
vision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vision Input Agents (Proposed — Not Yet Implemented)
This is a design proposal, not a shipped feature. Nothing described below exists in the codebase yet — this file exists to visualize the interface before writing any code. Do not follow these examples expecting them to work.
ActiveHarness could let agents accept images as input alongside a text prompt — "look at this and tell me X" — reusing the model chain, hooks, retry/fallback, and system_prompt machinery that already exists for text agents.
Proposed interface
class ReceiptAgent < ActiveHarness::Agent
vision true
system_prompt "You are an expenses auditor. Flag anything that looks like a duplicate or a personal (non-business) purchase."
model do
use provider: :openai, model: "gpt-4o-mini"
fallback provider: :anthropic, model: "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
end
end
result = ReceiptAgent.call(
input: "Does this receipt look legitimate?",
image: "/path/to/receipt.jpg"
)
result.output # => "This looks like a standard restaurant receipt. Nothing suspicious — itemized total matches the sum."
vision true— class-level flag, same shape asimage true/transcribe true. Validates that every model in the chain has"vision"in itsPricingcategories (this category already exists in the registry today — it's derived from a model's input modalities, the mirror image of"imggen", which is derived from output modalities. No changes needed on the pricing side to support this validation).image:— a new keyword at the call site, alongside the existinginput:,context:,params:,memory:,models:,token:,stream:. Accepts:- a single local file path (
"/path/to/photo.jpg") - an array of paths for multiple images in one message:
image: ["front.jpg", "back.jpg"] - a value that already looks like an
http(s)://URL is passed straight through as a URL reference instead of being read and base64-encoded — saves bandwidth when the image is already hosted somewhere.
- a single local file path (
@inputstays exactly what it already is for a normal agent: the text part of the prompt. This is the main difference fromimage true/transcribe true, where@inputhad to be repurposed (image prompt text, or an audio file path) because those are single-purpose, non-chat endpoints. Vision is a chat call with a richer message body, so@inputkeeps its normal meaning.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 87 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1d2b4eeb4e52
vision is an agent published in the GitHub repository the-teacher/active_harness (89 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,520 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
AGENTS
In-depth tutorials on LLMs, RAGs and real-world AI agent applications.
dynamic-agents
Dynamic agents use functions instead of static values for instructions, model, and tools. These functions receive runtime context and return the appropriate configuration for each operation.
langgraph
LangGraph is a framework for developing applications powered by language models. Integrating LangGraph with the Model Context Protocol (MCP) allows agents to utilize tools defined across one or more MCP servers, enabling seamless interaction with external data sources and services.
verify-agent
구현 완료 후 fresh-context 검증 전용. typecheck → lint → build → test 파이프라인 독립 실행. 단순 에러(import·타입) 자동 수정, 비수정 가능 에러 분류 보고. Use proactively — 비단순 코드 변경 완료 직후 사람 호출("검증해줘"·"빌드 확인")을 기다리지 말고 자율 spawn한다. 완료 주장 전 필수(verification.md 자율 검증 §11). 사람 발화에 의존하지 않는다. /handoff-verify 스킬에서도 자동 스폰. 구현 자체는 tdd-guide나 impl-worker 사용.
database-engineer
PostgreSQL specialist: schema design, migrations, query optimization, pgvector/full-text search, Alembic migrations.
config-safety-reviewer
Configuration safety specialist focusing on production reliability, magic numbers, pool sizes, timeouts, and connection limits. Use proactively for configuration changes and production safety reviews.