doc-analysis-risk-hotspots

A code-repository report that ranks the 12 files with the highest combined risk from recent trends and current issue severity, then examines the top five.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prioritize code review, maintenance, and risk reduction by file.
Why use it?
It helps teams find files that may need attention without manually combining issue lists, recent changes, and ownership information.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/theagenticguy/opencodehub/doc-analysis-risk-hotspots
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theagenticguy/opencodehub

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,690 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01690
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00845
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00338
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00169

Measured 2d ago against content hash 73efae4b465e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

doc-analysis-risk-hotspots scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/codehub-document/templates/agents/doc-analysis-risk-hotspots.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Packet · {{ repo }} · analysis/risk-hotspots.md

1. Objective

Produce {{ docs_root }}/analysis/risk-hotspots.md: a ranked table of the top 12 files in {{ repo }} by combined risk score (30-day trend slope + current finding severity), followed by a ## Per-file drill-down section with one H3 per top-5 hotspot covering what's there, recent activity, owners, and open findings.

2. Scope

  • Create: {{ docs_root }}/analysis/risk-hotspots.md
  • Do not touch: {{ docs_root }}/analysis/ownership.md, {{ docs_root }}/analysis/dead-code.md, any other file under {{ docs_root }}/, any source file in the repo, .context.md, .prefetch.md, or any .packets/*.md other than this one.

3. Input specification

Source Read how Cache state
Shared context Read {{ context_path }} always first
Prefetch ledger Read {{ prefetch_path }} always first
Owners summary {{ context_path }} § Owners summary cached
Risk trends mcp__codehub__risk_trends({repo: "{{ repo }}", window_days: 30}) mid-run
Current findings mcp__codehub__list_findings({repo: "{{ repo }}", severity: ">=warn"}) mid-run
Owners per hotspot mcp__codehub__owners({path: <file>}) or {{ prefetch_path }} § owners cached when present
Verdict context (optional) mcp__codehub__verdict({repo: "{{ repo }}"}) mid-run, optional

4. Process

  1. Read {{ context_path }} and Read {{ prefetch_path }}. Confirm the Owners summary and any cached findings/trend digests.
  2. Call mcp__codehub__risk_trends({repo: "{{ repo }}", window_days: 30}). Record the per-community / per-file trend slope (↑ rising, → flat, ↓ falling).
  3. Call mcp__codehub__list_findings({repo: "{{ repo }}", severity: ">=warn"}). Group findings by file_path; compute N warn, M error counts per file.
  4. Combine trend slope + severity into a risk score and rank files. Pick the top 12 for the ranking table; the top 5 feed the drill-down.
  5. For each top-12 file: resolve the top owner from {{ prefetch_path }} § owners when present, else mcp__codehub__owners({path: <file>}). Capture percentage share.
  6. Draft the ranked table with columns File | Trend | Open findings | Top owner | Citation. Every row cites the file as a backtick path with an optional (N LOC) suffix; every Open findings cell derives from list_findings output only.
  7. Draft the intro (2 paragraphs): what "risk" means here, how the scoring is composed, the window. If risk_trends returned status: "insufficient_history", note the limitation in the intro and drop the Trend column.
  8. Draft the ## Per-file drill-down section. One H3 per top-5 hotspot. Each H3 covers: What's there (2-sentence summary from context/Read), Recent activity (from risk_trends), Owners (top 1-2 with percentage share), Findings (counts by severity, each cited to list_findings).
  9. Write {{ docs_root }}/analysis/risk-hotspots.md with H1 = {{ repo }} · Risk hotspots.

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 106 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 73efae4b465e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

doc-analysis-risk-hotspots is an agent published in the GitHub repository theagenticguy/opencodehub (3 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,690 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.