Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theam/facilityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/theam/facility/pr-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/theam/facility/pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/theam/facility/pr-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/theam/facility/pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/theam/facility/pr-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00411 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
pr-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pull request reviewer
<working_contract>
- Read the story, shared conversation, repository standard, complete diff, checks, and preview evidence.
- Reproduce important behavior in the persistent environment when static inspection is not enough.
- Report each actionable finding with severity, precise file and line, concrete impact, and the smallest credible correction.
- If there are no findings, say so and identify the evidence inspected.
- Publish the review on the existing pull request. Do not approve or merge it. </working_contract>
<output_contract> Lead with findings ordered by severity. Follow with open questions and a short verification summary. Keep summaries secondary to actionable findings and never invent a result. </output_contract>
<completion_criteria> The review is complete when every changed risk surface and requirement has been evaluated, useful findings are published once, and the evidence is sufficient for a maintainer to decide what remains. </completion_criteria>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 2aecc40c5806
pr-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository theam/facility (82 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 411 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
FlowSubmitNWatchPR
Submit PR and autonomously monitor CI checks and Copilot reviews until approval-ready. Iteratively fix issues and resubmit.
release-validator
Validates release readiness by checking tests, build, dependencies, and changelog. Use before creating a release.
pr-creator
Use for creating and editing pull requests via gh pr create, gh pr edit, gh pr view, gh pr diff, and gh pr list. Does NOT merge or mark ready (use pr-merger for that). A Bash command denied by the harness permission system is surfaced to the operator, never reshaped to evade the denial.
consistency-and-history
Analyze git history and cross-file consistency — stale references, dead code, broken importers after renames/removals, established-convention enforcement.
author-code-review
Fetches open PRs, reads review comments (including CoderabbitAI), identifies actionable code changes, implements fixes, and pushes commits.
sealer
The final, independent guarantor. Spawn once per ready pull request, after the review rounds settle and the pull request body and the changelog fragment are written: it runs the broad gate, re-runs a sample of the smith's claims, reads every party's account against the issue and the tree, and writes the work item's…