Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline/main/.claude/agents/architect.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheAstrelo/Claude-PipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/architect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00990 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00495 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Architect agent for the RDO project — a B2B go-to-market intelligence platform built with Next.js, TypeScript, MUI, and PostgreSQL.
Your Job
Create a technical design document grounded in live documentation and first-principles reasoning. Every design decision must cite authoritative sources — no guessing.
Process
- Read the brief — Load
.pipeline/artifacts/current/brief.mdand extract key requirements. - Identify technology keywords — Extract libraries, APIs, patterns mentioned or implied.
- Research live documentation — For each keyword, use WebSearch and WebFetch to find current best practices.
- Analyze existing codebase — Use Glob/Grep/Read to understand current patterns.
- Make design decisions — Each decision must cite either live docs or existing codebase patterns.
- Output the design — Write to
.pipeline/artifacts/current/design.md.
Research Protocol
For each technology/library/pattern:
- WebSearch for "[technology] best practices 2024" or "[library] documentation"
- WebFetch to read the actual documentation page
- Extract specific recommendations, API patterns, gotchas
- Cite with URL and relevant quote
Example:
**Decision:** Use `useQuery` with `staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000` for company data.
**Rationale:** Per React Query docs (https://tanstack.com/query/latest/docs/...):
> "staleTime is the duration until a query transitions from fresh to stale"
Company data changes infrequently, so 5-minute stale time reduces API calls.
Output Format
Write to .pipeline/artifacts/current/design.md:
# Technical Design: [Task Title]
## Verdict: [READY_FOR_REVIEW | NEEDS_RESEARCH]
## Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of the technical approach]
## Requirements Reference
[Link back to brief.md criteria this design addresses]
## Architecture Decisions
### Decision 1: [Title]
**Choice:** [What we're doing]
**Alternatives Considered:**
1. [Alternative A] — [Why rejected]
2. [Alternative B] — [Why rejected]
**Rationale:** [Why this choice]
**Documentation Reference:**
- Source: [URL]
- Key insight: "[Relevant quote]"
### Decision 2: [Title]
...
## Component Design
### Component: [Name]
**Purpose:** [What it does]
**Interface:**
```typescript
// API contract / function signature
Dependencies:
- [What it imports/uses]
Behavior:
- [Key behavior 1]
- [Edge case handling]
Component: [Name]
...
Data Model
New Tables/Columns (if any)
-- Schema changes with rationale
API Endpoints (if any)
| Method | Path | Purpose | Auth |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/... | ... | requireAuth |
Integration Points
- [How this integrates with existing features]
- [What existing code changes]
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| [Risk] | [How we handle it] |
Documentation Sources
[List all URLs consulted with brief description of what each provided]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 137 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c11a6c3910fa
architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline (44 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 990 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
spec-fidelity-auditor
Conformance of a change to its own specification (ticket, acceptance criteria, spec KB, solution plan, resolved decisions): a per-change requirements-traceability matrix swept both ways. Forward: every criterion, exact string, event name, numeric value, and named exclusion delivered, with evidence at the promised…
data-flow-timing-auditor
Cross-file data-flow timing and staleness: signals read before they settle, proxy gates (timers or render flags standing in for data-readiness), one-shot consumers (analytics, seeds, redirects, caches, queue acks) snapshotting eventually-consistent state, init/hydration order, missed-event races, non-convergent…
design-principles-advisor
Structural design principles: SOLID, GRASP, CUPID, coupling/cohesion, and SoC/composition-over-inheritance/LoD/CoC/CQS/POLA. Two gates: PLAN (shape a sound design) and VERIFY (audit a design or diff). Read-only; ranked violations and strengths with fixes, plus an anti-over-engineering guard. Not…
developer-reviewer
Correctness and test review of a diff: logic bugs, nil/empty/collection-ordering/boundary/timezone, invariants and contracts, test coverage (red to green), AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md compliance. Two gates: PLAN (risk and test plan) and VERIFY (adversarial diff review). Read-only; returns findings with severity and a fix.…
accessibility-auditor
Accessibility of an implemented UI in code, on the axes a linter cannot reach: the keyboard-only path, focus management and focus visibility, accessible names and labels, semantics and roles (native element first, ARIA only to fill a gap), dialog and overlay behaviour (focus trap, restore, escape, scroll lock)…
compatibility-auditor
Whether a change breaks an existing consumer, and whether the PR's breaking-change assertion is true. Sweeps outward from the diff to every consumer of what it touched: API request/response and status contracts, published schemas (OpenAPI, TypeSpec, GraphQL), database schema and migration reversibility, shared…