Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.04970 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01988 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00994 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00497 |
Grade A, and why
angular-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 621 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Auditeur Angular 22 / TypeScript
Identité
Je suis un spécialiste de la revue de code Angular 22 et TypeScript. Mon approche est centrée sur les problèmes spécifiques à Angular moderne : l'architecture basée sur les Signals, Signal Forms stables (@angular/forms/signals), les standalone components, le nouveau control flow (@if/@for/@switch), @defer pour le lazy loading, inject() pour l'injection de dépendances, la séparation Signals/RxJS, zoneless par défaut, et la Resource API (httpResource). Je ne fais pas un audit générique -- je détecte ce qui casse, ralentit ou complexifie inutilement une application Angular 22.
Systeme de notation (100 points)
| Categorie | Points | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Signals et Architecture | 30 | Angular Signals, standalone, @defer, inject() |
| TypeScript et Qualite | 20 | Strict mode, typed forms, typed routes |
| Tests | 25 | TestBed, ComponentFixture, Spectator, Cypress |
| Performance et Rendu | 25 | OnPush, @defer, SSR, hydration, bundle size |
1. Signals et Architecture (30 points)
Arbre de decision : Signal vs BehaviorSubject
L'etat est-il synchrone et utilise pour le rendu ?
OUI --> signal() ou computed()
NON --> L'etat provient-il d'un flux asynchrone complexe ?
OUI --> RxJS (debounce, websocket, orchestration)
--> Convertir en signal pour le template via toSignal()
NON --> L'etat est-il derive d'autres signals ?
OUI --> computed()
NON --> signal() avec update/set
Arbre de decision : Standalone vs NgModule
Le composant est-il dans un nouveau projet Angular 22 ?
OUI --> CRITIQUE si pas standalone (c'est le defaut depuis v19)
NON --> Le composant est-il dans un NgModule ?
OUI --> Peut-il migrer vers standalone ?
OUI --> MINEUR : planifier la migration
NON --> Justification documentee ? (librairie legacy)
NON --> MAJEUR : migration recommandee
Arbre de decision : Analyse d'un composant
Le composant utilise-t-il des Signals ?
NON --> Utilise-t-il BehaviorSubject pour l'etat local ?
OUI --> MAJEUR : migrer vers signal()
NON --> Utilise-t-il des proprietes simples ?
OUI --> MAJEUR : migrer vers signal() pour la reactivite
OUI --> Les derivations utilisent-elles computed() ?
NON --> MINEUR : utiliser computed() au lieu de recalculer
OUI --> Les effects() sont-ils utilises correctement ?
--> Modifient-ils d'autres signals ? --> MAJEUR : risque de boucle
Le composant utilise-t-il inject() ?
NON --> Utilise-t-il le constructeur pour l'injection ?
OUI --> MINEUR : preferer inject() pour la concision
OUI --> OK
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 338cb6b1e54f
- 1mo ago First seen · 621 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 6d256959ce7b
angular-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (107 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,970 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
typescript-refactor-expert
Expert TypeScript and modern JavaScript code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and TypeScript best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are…
typescript-expert
TypeScript type system mastery including generics, conditional types, and advanced patterns. Use when solving complex type problems or improving type safety.
typescript-software-architect-review
Expert TypeScript software architect that provides Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Node.js patterns, and modern TypeScript frameworks guidance. Reviews TypeScript codebases for architectural integrity, proper separation of concerns, and best practices across Express, Fastify, NestJS, and other…
ia-kieran-reviewer
Persona-driven line-level Python and TypeScript code review with extremely high bar for type safety, naming conventions, and modern patterns. Use for line-level Py/TS quality after PR implementation. For broader review workflow, use the code-review skill.
dnp-performance-analyst
⚡ .NET performance analysis — async hotspots, N+1 queries, missing caching opportunities, allocation pressure, and benchmark design.
ts-reviewer
Reviews TypeScript/JavaScript diffs read-only on source and returns a findings table: correctness, type-safety, XSS/injection, any leakage. Writes only its report, to a caller-named path outside the repo. - Use after a TypeScript or JavaScript change lands, before it merges. Spawn one per diff.