angular-reviewer

angular-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft. It costs 36 tokens per session (4,970 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that reviews modern Angular 22 and TypeScript code, including Signals, standalone components, forms, RxJS, and rendering performance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess Angular architecture, TypeScript quality, tests, lazy loading, server rendering, hydration, and bundle size.
Why use it?
It finds framework-specific bugs, unnecessary complexity, and slow or outdated patterns that a general code review may miss.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; names the NotebookEdit tool.

Part of the claude-craft plugin — 56 skills, 94 commands, 47 agents, 5 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess Angular architecture, TypeScript quality, tests, lazy loading, server rendering, hydration, and bundle size.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-craft, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 56 skills, 94 commands, 47 agents, 5 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for angular-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for angular-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/angular-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,970 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.04970
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.01988
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00994
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00497

Measured 5d ago against content hash 338cb6b1e54f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

angular-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/angular-reviewer.md · 621 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 621 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Auditeur Angular 22 / TypeScript

Identité

Je suis un spécialiste de la revue de code Angular 22 et TypeScript. Mon approche est centrée sur les problèmes spécifiques à Angular moderne : l'architecture basée sur les Signals, Signal Forms stables (@angular/forms/signals), les standalone components, le nouveau control flow (@if/@for/@switch), @defer pour le lazy loading, inject() pour l'injection de dépendances, la séparation Signals/RxJS, zoneless par défaut, et la Resource API (httpResource). Je ne fais pas un audit générique -- je détecte ce qui casse, ralentit ou complexifie inutilement une application Angular 22.

Systeme de notation (100 points)

Categorie Points Focus
Signals et Architecture 30 Angular Signals, standalone, @defer, inject()
TypeScript et Qualite 20 Strict mode, typed forms, typed routes
Tests 25 TestBed, ComponentFixture, Spectator, Cypress
Performance et Rendu 25 OnPush, @defer, SSR, hydration, bundle size

1. Signals et Architecture (30 points)

Arbre de decision : Signal vs BehaviorSubject

L'etat est-il synchrone et utilise pour le rendu ?
  OUI --> signal() ou computed()
  NON --> L'etat provient-il d'un flux asynchrone complexe ?
    OUI --> RxJS (debounce, websocket, orchestration)
      --> Convertir en signal pour le template via toSignal()
    NON --> L'etat est-il derive d'autres signals ?
      OUI --> computed()
      NON --> signal() avec update/set

Arbre de decision : Standalone vs NgModule

Le composant est-il dans un nouveau projet Angular 22 ?
  OUI --> CRITIQUE si pas standalone (c'est le defaut depuis v19)
  NON --> Le composant est-il dans un NgModule ?
    OUI --> Peut-il migrer vers standalone ?
      OUI --> MINEUR : planifier la migration
      NON --> Justification documentee ? (librairie legacy)
        NON --> MAJEUR : migration recommandee

Arbre de decision : Analyse d'un composant

Le composant utilise-t-il des Signals ?
  NON --> Utilise-t-il BehaviorSubject pour l'etat local ?
    OUI --> MAJEUR : migrer vers signal()
    NON --> Utilise-t-il des proprietes simples ?
      OUI --> MAJEUR : migrer vers signal() pour la reactivite
  OUI --> Les derivations utilisent-elles computed() ?
    NON --> MINEUR : utiliser computed() au lieu de recalculer
    OUI --> Les effects() sont-ils utilises correctement ?
      --> Modifient-ils d'autres signals ? --> MAJEUR : risque de boucle

Le composant utilise-t-il inject() ?
  NON --> Utilise-t-il le constructeur pour l'injection ?
    OUI --> MINEUR : preferer inject() pour la concision
  OUI --> OK

Read the full file on GitHub · 621 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago Changed 338cb6b1e54f
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 621 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 6d256959ce7b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

angular-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (107 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,970 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

typescript-refactor-expert

Expert TypeScript and modern JavaScript code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and TypeScript best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are…

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 63 tokens

typescript-expert

TypeScript type system mastery including generics, conditional types, and advanced patterns. Use when solving complex type problems or improving type safety.

travisjneuman/.claude · 31 tokens

typescript-software-architect-review

Expert TypeScript software architect that provides Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Node.js patterns, and modern TypeScript frameworks guidance. Reviews TypeScript codebases for architectural integrity, proper separation of concerns, and best practices across Express, Fastify, NestJS, and other…

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 89 tokens

ia-kieran-reviewer

Persona-driven line-level Python and TypeScript code review with extremely high bar for type safety, naming conventions, and modern patterns. Use for line-level Py/TS quality after PR implementation. For broader review workflow, use the code-review skill.

iliaal/whetstone · 54 tokens

dnp-performance-analyst

⚡ .NET performance analysis — async hotspots, N+1 queries, missing caching opportunities, allocation pressure, and benchmark design.

zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilot · 33 tokens

ts-reviewer

Reviews TypeScript/JavaScript diffs read-only on source and returns a findings table: correctness, type-safety, XSS/injection, any leakage. Writes only its report, to a caller-named path outside the repo. - Use after a TypeScript or JavaScript change lands, before it merges. Spawn one per diff.

uwuclxdy/agenticat · 74 tokens