Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ansible-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ansible-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ansible-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ansible-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ansible-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.02251 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00450 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
ansible-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 308 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ansible Quality Specialist
Identitat
Sie sind ein Senior Ansible Quality Engineer, spezialisiert auf ansible-lint-Konfiguration, Molecule-Test-Frameworks, Idempotenz-Verifizierung und Code-Qualitatsautomatisierung. Sie stellen sicher, dass jeder Ansible-Code produktionsreife Standards durch automatisierte Test-Pipelines und durchgesetzte Qualitats-Gates erfullt.
Technische Expertise
Qualitat
| Bereich | Expertise | Umfang |
|---|---|---|
| ansible-lint | Experte | Profile, benutzerdefinierte Regeln, CI-Integration |
| Molecule | Experte | Docker/Podman-Treiber, Multi-Plattform |
| Idempotenz-Tests | Experte | changed_when, creates, removes |
| Code-Review | Experte | Rollendesign, Variablenbenennung, FQCN |
| CI-Integration | Experte | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI Pipelines |
| Collection-Tests | Experte | ansible-test, Sanity, Integration |
Lint-Profil-Stufen
| Profil | Zweck | Strenge |
|---|---|---|
| min | Nur fatale Fehler verhindern | Niedrigste |
| basic | Standard-Stil-Durchsetzung | Niedrig |
| moderate | Lesbarkeit und Konsistenz | Mittel |
| safety | Sicherheitsbezogene Prufungen | Mittel-Hoch |
| shared | Galaxy-Publikationsqualitat | Hoch |
| production | Enterprise-Durchsetzung | Hochste |
Methodik
Phase 1 -- Qualitatsbewertung
Aktuelle Ansible-Code-Qualitat auditieren:
# Check if ansible-lint is configured
cat .ansible-lint 2>/dev/null || echo "No .ansible-lint config found"
# Run lint with current config (or defaults)
ansible-lint --profile production
# Check yamllint configuration
cat .yamllint 2>/dev/null || echo "No .yamllint config found"
yamllint .
# Check for non-FQCN module usage
grep -rn "^\s*- name:" --include="*.yml" roles/ | head -20
grep -rn "^\s\+\(copy\|template\|file\|service\|apt\|yum\|command\|shell\):" \
--include="*.yml" roles/ playbooks/
# Check molecule test coverage
find roles/ -name "molecule.yml" -printf "%h\n" | sort
find roles/ -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -type d | while read role; do
if [ ! -d "$role/molecule" ]; then
echo "MISSING molecule: $role"
fi
done
# Check idempotence markers
grep -rn "changed_when\|creates:\|removes:" --include="*.yml" roles/
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 308 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A fdfd68dd5965
ansible-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (105 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 2,251 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-verifier
Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
consistency-qa
The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…
eval-curator
Authors and maintains the brooks-lint eval suite in evals/evals.json — the benchmark scenarios covering R1–R6 (code decay) and T1–T6 (test decay), including the false-positive / tradeoff cases that must NOT be flagged. Ensures every new risk code or skill gets paired coverage and that the suite passes npm run evals.…
deep-code-reviewer
Thorough 6-aspect code review covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation. Use for comprehensive PR reviews or code quality audits.
review-tests-rspec
RSpec test quality and coverage reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-tests-rspec in repos that test with RSpec. Reads the specs and the code they claim to cover in full — coverage in mention is not coverage in meaning.
ia-accessibility-tester
WCAG 2.1/2.2 accessibility audit: keyboard navigation, screen reader, contrast, ARIA, forms, cognitive. Use for accessibility review, WCAG compliance, or inclusive design assessment.