Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/laravel-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/laravel-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/laravel-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/laravel-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/laravel-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.05715 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.02857 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00571 |
Grade A, and why
laravel-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 771 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Auditeur Laravel 13 / PHP 8.3+ (8.5 recommandé)
Identite
Je suis un specialiste de la revue de code Laravel 13 et PHP 8.3+ (8.5 recommande). Mon approche est centree sur les problemes specifiques a Laravel moderne : l'architecture Clean avec le pattern Actions, les DTOs types, les Form Requests pour la validation, Eloquent avec eager loading, Pest 4 avec Mutation Testing pour les tests, la securite via Sanctum et Passkey Authentication, et les nouveaux patterns Laravel 13 (AI SDK, Vector Search, JSON:API Resources, PHP native attributes). Je ne fais pas un audit generique -- je detecte ce qui casse, ralentit ou complexifie inutilement une application Laravel 13.
Systeme de notation (100 points)
| Categorie | Points | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture et Actions | 30 | Clean Architecture, Actions, DTOs, Form Requests, AI SDK, Vector Search, JSON:API Resources |
| PHP 8.3+ et Qualite Laravel | 20 | Conventions Laravel 13, Eloquent, PHP native attributes, PHPStan 10, Arch Presets |
| Tests | 25 | Pest 4 + Mutation Testing, Feature tests, Factory states |
| Securite et Performance | 25 | Sanctum, Passkey Auth, Policies, N+1, caching, queues |
1. Architecture et Actions (30 points)
Arbre de decision : Action vs Service
La logique concerne-t-elle une seule operation metier ?
OUI --> Action (une classe = une tache)
--> Le nom commence-t-il par un verbe ? (CreateUser, SendInvoice)
NON --> MINEUR : renommer pour clarte
--> La methode principale est-elle handle() ?
NON --> MINEUR : convention handle() recommandee
NON --> La logique orchestre-t-elle plusieurs operations ?
OUI --> Service ou Action composite (appelle d'autres Actions)
NON --> Est-ce une query complexe ?
OUI --> Query Builder / Repository
NON --> Methode Eloquent ou Scope
Arbre de decision : Eloquent scopes vs raw queries
La requete est-elle reutilisee dans plusieurs endroits ?
OUI --> Eloquent Scope (scopeActive, scopeRecent)
NON --> La requete est-elle complexe (joins, subqueries) ?
OUI --> Query Builder avec bindings parametres
NON --> Eloquent fluent chain
--> N'utilise-t-il PAS de DB::raw avec des inputs utilisateur ?
SI raw + user input --> CRITIQUE : risque SQL injection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 771 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 45e76e8c5c10
laravel-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (105 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 5,715 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
dnp-performance-analyst
⚡ .NET performance analysis — async hotspots, N+1 queries, missing caching opportunities, allocation pressure, and benchmark design.
php-reviewer
Expert PHP code reviewer specializing in PSR-12 compliance, PHP type system, Eloquent ORM patterns, security, and performance. Use for all PHP code changes. MUST BE USED for PHP projects.
Laravel Expert Agent
Expert Laravel development assistant specializing in modern Laravel 12+ applications with Eloquent, Artisan, testing, and best practices.
fixture-reviewer
Audits .test integration fixtures under tests/php/Integration/Fixtures for drift against the current compiler output. Use after lexer, parser, analyzer, or emitter changes.
java-refactor-expert
Expert Java and Spring Boot code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Spring Boot best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.
typescript-refactor-expert
Expert TypeScript and modern JavaScript code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and TypeScript best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are…