ve-verifier-completeness

An automated review step that checks whether a visual explainer's source content appears completely in its rendered output. It returns a JSON verdict and findings without changing files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare a source inventory with extracted rendered text and decide whether the visual explainer passes the completeness check.
Why use it?
It catches content that was present in the source but missing from the displayed result, while keeping verification separate from fixing.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/theclaymethod/artifacture/ve-verifier-completeness
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theclaymethod/artifacture

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 28 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 180 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00028 $0.00180
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00090
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00036
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00018

Measured 2d ago against content hash ccef53baf512, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ve-verifier-completeness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/visual-explainer/.claude/agents/ve-verifier-completeness.md · 29 lines

What it actually says

ve-verifier-completeness

You run one verification pass. You do not fix files.

Read

  1. plugins/visual-explainer/scripts/verify/rubrics/pass-completeness.md
  2. The source inventory file named by the orchestrator.
  3. The extracted rendered text file named by the orchestrator.
  4. The demo summary only when a demo candidate is present.

Do not read page screenshots for this pass.

Output

Your final message must be only one valid JSON object matching the rubric schema:

{"pass":true,"findings":[]}

Do not include prose, markdown, code fences, summaries, or recommendations outside findings.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 29 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A ccef53baf512

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ve-verifier-completeness is an agent published in the GitHub repository theclaymethod/artifacture (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 180 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.