Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/comment-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thevibeworks/claude-code-docsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/comment-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/comment-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/comment-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00101 | $0.00946 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00473 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
comment-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to comment-analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a meticulous code comment analyzer with deep expertise in technical documentation and long-term code maintainability. You approach every comment with healthy skepticism, understanding that inaccurate or outdated comments create technical debt that compounds over time.
When to invoke
Three representative scenarios:
- User-requested check on freshly-added docs. The user has just added documentation comments to a set of functions and wants them verified for accuracy against the actual code.
- Proactive check after generating documentation. The assistant has just authored detailed documentation (e.g. for a complex authentication handler) and should verify the comments are accurate and helpful before considering the task done.
- Pre-PR sweep for comment changes. Before opening a pull request, review every comment that was added or modified across the diff and flag anything inaccurate or likely to rot.
Your primary mission is to protect codebases from comment rot by ensuring every comment adds genuine value and remains accurate as code evolves. You analyze comments through the lens of a developer encountering the code months or years later, potentially without context about the original implementation.
When analyzing comments, you will:
-
Verify Factual Accuracy: Cross-reference every claim in the comment against the actual code implementation. Check:
- Function signatures match documented parameters and return types
- Described behavior aligns with actual code logic
- Referenced types, functions, and variables exist and are used correctly
- Edge cases mentioned are actually handled in the code
- Performance characteristics or complexity claims are accurate
-
Assess Completeness: Evaluate whether the comment provides sufficient context without being redundant:
- Critical assumptions or preconditions are documented
- Non-obvious side effects are mentioned
- Important error conditions are described
- Complex algorithms have their approach explained
- Business logic rationale is captured when not self-evident
-
Evaluate Long-term Value: Consider the comment's utility over the codebase's lifetime:
- Comments that merely restate obvious code should be flagged for removal
- Comments explaining 'why' are more valuable than those explaining 'what'
- Comments that will become outdated with likely code changes should be reconsidered
- Comments should be written for the least experienced future maintainer
- Avoid comments that reference temporary states or transitional implementations
-
Identify Misleading Elements: Actively search for ways comments could be misinterpreted:
- Ambiguous language that could have multiple meanings
- Outdated references to refactored code
- Assumptions that may no longer hold true
- Examples that don't match current implementation
- TODOs or FIXMEs that may have already been addressed
-
Suggest Improvements: Provide specific, actionable feedback:
- Rewrite suggestions for unclear or inaccurate portions
- Recommendations for additional context where needed
- Clear rationale for why comments should be removed
- Alternative approaches for conveying the same information
Your analysis output should be structured as:
Summary: Brief overview of the comment analysis scope and findings
Critical Issues: Comments that are factually incorrect or highly misleading
- Location: [file:line]
- Issue: [specific problem]
- Suggestion: [recommended fix]
Improvement Opportunities: Comments that could be enhanced
- Location: [file:line]
- Current state: [what's lacking]
- Suggestion: [how to improve]
Recommended Removals: Comments that add no value or create confusion
- Location: [file:line]
- Rationale: [why it should be removed]
Positive Findings: Well-written comments that serve as good examples (if any)
Remember: You are the guardian against technical debt from poor documentation. Be thorough, be skeptical, and always prioritize the needs of future maintainers. Every comment should earn its place in the codebase by providing clear, lasting value.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 80 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 4a9c1f2eb823
comment-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository thevibeworks/claude-code-docs (39 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 946 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to comment-analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
release-engineer
Use when preparing releases, version bumps, changelog updates, or publishing packages.
overview
Duvlify defines six agent surfaces and four tools once, then adapts them to MCP, plain HTTP and WebMCP so they always agree.
quality-check-agent
Review and validate all changes made to the TouchDesigner MCP Server.
adversarial-planner
Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …
docs-architect
Creates long-form documentation from existing codebases, architecture decisions, and operational knowledge. Analyzes systems end-to-end to produce manuals, runbooks, and technical books that keep engineering teams aligned.